29 The Satanic Verses

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
651 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 22, 2008

This Video is Made by the Guys at inthenameofallah.org, Ahmadsquran3, or as you all know them Muhammadsquran.

They were suspended from youtube by muslim flagging campaigns. Watch and learn please.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @kind4love What is that 'historical way of investigation' and how and what are "early historians views are more reliable than recent historians?'

    Recent historians will also bank upon reliable sources. They are not eye witnesses.

    He does not give any references. He gives hadis which is disputed. Sources are sources. Hadis is not source at all.

    Those who believe hadis, too, reject hadis which is conflicting Quran. What he quotes conflicts Quran.

  • @reasonlight An edited copy, or recension, prepared by Ibn Ishaq student Salamah ibn Fadl al-Ansari. This also has perished, and survives only in the copious extracts to be found in the volumimous historian al-Tabari's. (Donner 1998, p. 132)

    fragments of several other recensions. Guillaume lists them on p. xxx of his preface, but regards most of them as so fragmentary as to be of little worth.

    Where is Ibne Ishaq? NOWHERE. People used his mysterious name to give legitimacy to the lies.

  • @kind4love Ibn Ishaq's alleged collection of traditions about the life of Muhammad also called Sīrat Nabawiyya or Sīrah Rasūl Allāh, too, did not survive except its mention in two sources which can be a lie.:

    An edited copy, or RECENSION, of his work by his student al-Bakka'i, as further edited by Ibn Hisham. Al-Bakka'i's work has PERISHED and only Ibn Hisham's has survived, in copies.This is the story of trustworthiness of the so called 'EARLIEST ISLAMIC SOURCES'. Do you know recension?

  • @kind4love Ibn Isḥaq was born circa AH 85, or roughly 704 CE, in Medina. He was the grandson of a man, Yasār, He became the slave of Ḳays b. Mak̲h̲rama b. al-Muṭṭalib b. ʿAbd Manāf b. Ḳuṣayy and, having accepted Islam, thus acquiring the nisba al-Muṭṭalibī. Yasār's three sons, Mūsā, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān, and Isḥāq, who alleged ly collected and recounted tales of the past. Isḥāq married the daughter of another mawlā and from this marriage Ibn Isḥāḳ was born. HIS WORK IS NOT FOUND BY HIS NAME.

  • @reasonlight

    That is one of the blank statement that you make without justifying your claims. The issue of satanic verses is one of the failures of muhammad as a prophet. According to historical way of investigation, early historians views are more reliable than recent historians. Go and read the references he gave and see things for yourself because all is from your sources.

  • Had there been no hadith, you would have been orphan. These absurd, unverifiable, stupid narrations are believed outright by stupid muslims. The clergy is making money out this trash. Now the anti Islam forces have found them to attack Islam. They dont read Quran. Muslims have also divorced Quran and chosen hadis for their guidance. It is blatant shirk. They would know it when they meet Allah.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more