@yoinkz Okay, just watch his podcast on utilitarianism, where his first criticism is that utilitarianism does not account for what the good is, as if there are not dozens of articles by utilitarians on this very topic. When someone has the space, time, and audience to talk about serious issues, it seems to me that they should take the time and energy to address them with care.
@dadrogon just as a bonus, it would be really interesting if you, just briefly explain to a simple minded person like me, that you understand the ideas yourself and the message of stefbot's criticisms, so that your criticisms(statement) don't seem completely shallow. ironically. I guess I just like to think that stef's ideas are consistent, bit maybe I'm just uninformed, or maybe my brain is inconsistent(!). anyhow, I keep my mind as open as I'm capable of :)
I hated that book. I thought it was really shallow, and frankly, most of Stefbots ideas are shallow. Good examples of this are his videos one utilitarianism and "the social construction of reality". In both of those videos he fails two understand the ideas he is criticizing or gives criticisms that have been answered for like decades.
@SpiderWhiteYT Other than a few 19th century writers, the two ideologies have really nothing to do with one another. So the obvious answer is that "Anarcho"-Capitalist books will talk about markets and how good they are. Anarchist books praise democracy in an absolute way.
@yoinkz Okay, just watch his podcast on utilitarianism, where his first criticism is that utilitarianism does not account for what the good is, as if there are not dozens of articles by utilitarians on this very topic. When someone has the space, time, and audience to talk about serious issues, it seems to me that they should take the time and energy to address them with care.
dadrogon 9 months ago
@dadrogon just as a bonus, it would be really interesting if you, just briefly explain to a simple minded person like me, that you understand the ideas yourself and the message of stefbot's criticisms, so that your criticisms(statement) don't seem completely shallow. ironically. I guess I just like to think that stef's ideas are consistent, bit maybe I'm just uninformed, or maybe my brain is inconsistent(!). anyhow, I keep my mind as open as I'm capable of :)
yoinkz 9 months ago
I hated that book. I thought it was really shallow, and frankly, most of Stefbots ideas are shallow. Good examples of this are his videos one utilitarianism and "the social construction of reality". In both of those videos he fails two understand the ideas he is criticizing or gives criticisms that have been answered for like decades.
dadrogon 1 year ago
@SpiderWhiteYT Other than a few 19th century writers, the two ideologies have really nothing to do with one another. So the obvious answer is that "Anarcho"-Capitalist books will talk about markets and how good they are. Anarchist books praise democracy in an absolute way.
dadrogon 1 year ago
How can you tell the difference between an anarcho-capatlist book versus an anarcho-social?
SpiderWhiteYT 1 year ago