Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS) Executive Director and former Colorado Supreme Court Justice Rebecca Love Kourlis recently moderated a stellar panel of experts who debated the problems and solutions associated with escalating e-discovery costs and their impact on the U.S. legal system.
Learn more about this issue and IAALS at www.du.edu/legalinstitute.
'Virtually all communication is electronic...100 billion emails worldwide daily...they would completely fill five five story buildings...We at the institute realize the process can be subverted if the judges are not knowledgeable and attentive...'
Does the average judicial person consider this information so useful to the reform pursuit as to be worthy of inclusion in a youtube post? I think we already know there are a lot of emails and that judges need to be attentive etc.
cowgirlradio22 1 month ago
In their publication '21st Century Civil Justice System' the IAALS concludes: 'It requires careful planning...careful gathering of data...and careful analysis of the data gathered... the problems facing the civil justice system are profound, and the solutions must be well thought-out and tested...
As a scientist trying to understand the judicial mind, are these conclusions considered worthy of publication? In science I think these would be considered too vacuous and obvious for publication.
cowgirlradio22 1 month ago