physics forceps 2 cases
Loading...
6,839
Loading...
Uploader Comments (perieau)
see all
All Comments (6)
-
@perieau Will we use these terms for reasons marketers? .
Largely ignoring the biology and all cellular processes that are triggered when we perform these operations. You as a teacher probably has a better formed the opinion.
Yours faithfully.
Loading...
Dear Doctor: In your experience you think about thephysics forceps are considered essential or necessary for the practice of atraumatic extractions. Again I congratulate you for the quality art and conveys his technique and knowledge.
Greetings from Argentina
pollocba566 9 months ago
@pollocba566 when the physics forceps loosens the tooth in a minute then we remove with regular forceps. If no movement after a minute of even force then I go to sectioning. So about less than 50% of the time they work and it saves me a lot of time. But to get teeth out flapless with minimal trauma I feel they are worth a try. I don't try them on molars at all (don't work very well with more risk of damage to buccal plate). Doesn't it seem like an oxymoron to call extractions "atraumatic"?
perieau 9 months ago
@perieau I express misusing the term "atraumatic extraction, " and I totally agree with that is contradictory.
I owe again
pollocba566 9 months ago
@pollocba566 I think it's funny how we like to think we can be "atraumatic" doing surgery, even though our minimally invasive and microsurgical techniques can produce some very rapid healing...
perieau 9 months ago