Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Stipa-Caproni Flying Barrel (take-off footage only)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
403,026
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 30, 2007

The principle of ducted fans is well understood now. They require a duct with correct tapering at each end and a low drag but powerful engine at its core. Multiple-bladed propellers, or a fan as on a modern high-bypass turbofan are needed for efficiency. Placing a Tiger Moth engine inside a fat tube doesn't cut it. An Italian government engineer, Luigi Stipa, convinced the Caproni Company to build an aircraft to test his theory that a tubular fuselage gave significant extra thrust to a conventional engine and propeller. The resulting Caproni-Stipa aircraft had a corpulent annular fuselage, which concealed a Gipsy engine and two-bladed propeller. All this achieved was high drag and low noise, although the landing speed was reduced to 68km/h. Performance was otherwise lower than a conventional airframe with the same powerplant.

Stipa claimed that the outer fuselage was profiled to generate lift. It was said that this contributed 37% of the total. The Stipa's pilot and passenger had to sit in cockpits perched atop the fuselage. An inherent flaw in the design is that there is little room for any payload. Humped surfaces around the cockpits would have seriously impeded the view of pilot and passenger unless they leaned to one side, which would have been essential during take-off and landing.

Specification CREW 2
ENGINE 1 x 120hp de Havilland Gipsy III inline piston engine
WEIGHTS Take-off weight 800 kg 1764 lb
DIMENSIONS Wingspan 14.28 m 46 ft 10 in Length 5.88 m 19 ft 3 in Height 3.00 m 9 ft 10 in
PERFORMANCE Max. speed 131 km/h 81 mph

  • likes, 14 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • do a barrel roll

  • Although it appeared to be a simple "fan", It was actually propelled by a stream of bird blood and shredded feathers.

see all

All Comments (292)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • That is without a doubt one of the ugliest aeroplanes I've ever seen. I once saw one made in France that was slightly uglier, but I forget what it was called. Or perhaps my mind forced me to forget to spare my sanity.

    Seriously, can anybody think of an aeroplane uglier than the Flying Barrel?

    (I rarely ask for this, but: thumbs up if you think this is an interesting challenge.)

  • I think it's diet spans from small birds to small plains to the occasional European swallow

  • Ah, the barrel buster 2000. At the top of every pilots Christmas list......

  • Would it be an autobot.... or decepticon?

  • Dear Santa....

  • And in Summer you backed it up to your living room window and fired it up.

  • it can eat other planes!!!

  • early stages of stealth design.

  • @MrAndyBones hahahaha!!!

  • there is clearlly a water mark on top of the another one on this clip. it was taken from someone else and then re-edited

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more