Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Baker-Nord Center for the Humanities Lecture: Avital Ronell

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,318
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 12, 2008

Using an historical, philosophical and cultural analysis, Avital Ronnel will explore the prevalent and ubiquitous use of testing in search of the truth.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Thanks for posting this. Fabulous.

  • she's the Jacques Derrida professor of deconstruction at the European Graduate School and a university professor at NYU, which is the highest distinction of a professor at NYU. I don't know why you're AHAHA!-ing but it's pretty ridiculous.

see all

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ellipsis... without repetition.

  • cont'd.. condition of self-knowledge as the no-longer given and yet what is known to a degree and yet where more is to come.. I see myself as object of your gaze and subject of my own sight.. and you as someone who stands beside me and thus another objective subject, another question, another test seeking an answer.. but why should you be ephemeral, urgent, eager to pass me by without greeting me..to, at the very least, acknowledge our mutual passing, and mutuality of recognition, seeing this..

  • Wonderful about 'testing' and 'Jewish evanescent sensibility' but I wonder if this isn't contradicted to a degree. I mean, Jewish Diaspora notwithstanding, how do we understand the bond that contrary coherence around Israel...the chosen people, etc. Couldn't testing be a kind of appeal? A form of beggary? Begging to know, out of ignorance, the frustration of the desire for knowledge, clarity, knowing who and what belongs to where, and with whom.. that is to say, 'the test' might be the basic..

  • interesting topic..

  • The whole thing about unintelligibility as a justifiable approach relates to her role as a continental philosopher rather than an analytical one. I can presume she measures her success as a thinker, and believes we should do the same, by the amount of thinking she has incited and not by an "absolute truth" she is aiming toward. Unintelligibility would certainly be accepted as a literary device, and literature and philosophy share a certain incitement of thought as their most immediate influence.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more