Barsana Dham: Indian Godman held for child abuse gets bail

IBN

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• prakashanand
• saraswati
• barsana
• dham
• jkp

[Vedantka]

@annica570 Obviously most of the time people call things outrageous if they find them simply different from their belief system and without even bothering to understand the subject,they eagerly jump to the conclusions based on their own prejudiced imagination.That is not very civilized way to operate in modern mixed societies.But unfortunately it is the reality in many cases....

[annica570]

@Vedantka (ex: protecting a person's right to follow even mother theresa or partake in satanic rituals if they'd like).

[annica570]

@Vedantka i totally respect your views, opinion and right to those beliefs. those beliefs should be protected from the institution of mob rule that affected this case. the state does not govern, but does the opposite under these circumstances, crushing minority cultures in a kind of neo-racist, authoritarian way. the government is supposed to protect the right to believe and voice even things anyone thinks is outrageous.

[Vedantka]

@annica570 The problem is that Swamiji is not a simple man.He's books show clearly His Divinity and His accomplishment with Barsana Dham shows His amazing capability to inspire people.Nowadays fake saints like Mother Teresa(=Angel of Hell) are praised and genuine Saints like our beloved Swamiji are persecuted.These are the evils of Kaliyug and we all pay prize for it.It is enough to look around,Mother Nature is crying and there is so much injustice causing suffering to millions.

[annica570]

anyone paying attention to any of this, beyond any texan redneck believing everything the manipulated and co opted media feeds them, knows this is baloney. prakshanand is clearly and obviously innocent based on the evidence of the court's evidential cover up of the official... "evidence"...which was a testimony of the alleged lying woman claiming to have been molested. did it just magically vanish?

[annica570]

or was it destroyed, because it could have easily been criticized to prove prakashanand's innocence? and the prosecuting atty. told the jury to, in his own

[annica570]

the state has done this to hindu gurus for decades, because the ashrams are non-profit, do not rely on the corporate infested state for subsidies or food etc. these ashrams are SELF SUSTAINED communities, and the corporate state hates them. this is why guru after guru has been convicted of outrageous charges to break up the movements they create here and steal their money, which the county is doing in VIOLATION of the separation of church and state.

[annica570]

so, rather than lock up a an innocent, simple old religious man whose supporters rightfully helped him flee, the state will do what they intended: steal the ashram's money and break up their movement to condition them to be reliant on the corporate hand to feed them instead of the responsible, self sustained, disciplined motives of a hard working, genuine spiritual community.