Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

The Rorty Discussion with Donald Davidson - Part 4 of 6

An interesting discussion between two great philosophers of the latter half of the 20th century, exploring topics such as truth, meaning and reference. I apologize for the audio sync. It was a prob...  
 
Customize

More From: riversonthemoon

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
8 ratings
Sign in to rate
983 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (5)   Options

Loading...
Questfortruth86 (3 days ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I haven't read much Rorty, but it seems as though his relativism and nihilism, basically his attack on reason and truth, are mere tools to justify of his own ideology--namely Marxism. Now, I don't know if he's a Marxist, but it sure seems like it. There has never been a rational Marxist, or one who made much sense. They ride the abstraction train, which has is so fashionable.
hyperseauton (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Let Frege re-Kantianize us"
hits the nail on its head. Davidson is somewhat skeptical that what is essential still the Kantian plan of the philosophical project does still steer analytical philosophy but I think this is a wounding blow to Davidson at this point.
hyperseauton (2 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Kibitzing over alternative discourses within the culture...cleaning up some loose edges"
lulz. I think that is exactly what philosophy is.
Davidson's social commentary that philosophy is bastardized nowadays and his eulogy to Russell goes somewhat to show that he would like to go back to a time where philosophy was done by white upper-class males, and I am not trolling, I really think he is nostalgic about those "good ol' days".
manwaring (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I don't know, I'm sure the ad-hominem is entirely justified. It must have been really exciting to live in a time when people thought Frege's new language was actually going to solve philosophical problems. I don't think there's some sexist longing behind Davidson's ideas.

While I obviously don't agree with the ideas presented back then, you've gotta respect the endevour of something like the Tractatus or the Principia.
hyperseauton (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"you've gotta respect the endevour of something like the Tractatus or the Principia." of course and still do. My second comment must have been trolling when I re-read what I have written.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.