An interesting discussion between two great philosophers of the latter half of the 20th century, exploring topics such as truth, meaning and reference. I apologize for the audio sync. It was a prob...
An interesting discussion between two great philosophers of the latter half of the 20th century, exploring topics such as truth, meaning and reference. I apologize for the audio sync. It was a problem with the original file (not that it matters much, the video is simply two old men talking).
Richard Rorty (1931-2007) developed a distinctive and controversial brand of pragmatism that expressed itself along two main axes. One is negative—a critical diagnosis of what Rorty takes to be defining projects of modern philosophy. The other is positive—an attempt to show what intellectual culture might look like, once we free ourselves from the governing metaphors of mind and knowledge in which the traditional problems of epistemology and metaphysics (and indeed, in Rorty's view, the self-conception of modern philosophy) are rooted.
Donald Davidson (1917-2003) was one of the most important philosophers of the latter half of the twentieth century. His ideas, presented in a series of essays from the 1960's onwards, have been influential across a range of areas from semantic theory through to epistemology and ethics. Davidson's work exhibits a breadth of approach, as well as a unitary and systematic character, which is unusual within twentieth century analytic philosophy.
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
I haven't read much Rorty, but it seems as though his relativism and nihilism, basically his attack on reason and truth, are mere tools to justify of his own ideology--namely Marxism. Now, I don't know if he's a Marxist, but it sure seems like it. There has never been a rational Marxist, or one who made much sense. They ride the abstraction train, which has is so fashionable.
"Let Frege re-Kantianize us" hits the nail on its head. Davidson is somewhat skeptical that what is essential still the Kantian plan of the philosophical project does still steer analytical philosophy but I think this is a wounding blow to Davidson at this point.
"Kibitzing over alternative discourses within the culture...cleaning up some loose edges" lulz. I think that is exactly what philosophy is. Davidson's social commentary that philosophy is bastardized nowadays and his eulogy to Russell goes somewhat to show that he would like to go back to a time where philosophy was done by white upper-class males, and I am not trolling, I really think he is nostalgic about those "good ol' days".
I don't know, I'm sure the ad-hominem is entirely justified. It must have been really exciting to live in a time when people thought Frege's new language was actually going to solve philosophical problems. I don't think there's some sexist longing behind Davidson's ideas.
While I obviously don't agree with the ideas presented back then, you've gotta respect the endevour of something like the Tractatus or the Principia.
"you've gotta respect the endevour of something like the Tractatus or the Principia." of course and still do. My second comment must have been trolling when I re-read what I have written.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
hits the nail on its head. Davidson is somewhat skeptical that what is essential still the Kantian plan of the philosophical project does still steer analytical philosophy but I think this is a wounding blow to Davidson at this point.
lulz. I think that is exactly what philosophy is.
Davidson's social commentary that philosophy is bastardized nowadays and his eulogy to Russell goes somewhat to show that he would like to go back to a time where philosophy was done by white upper-class males, and I am not trolling, I really think he is nostalgic about those "good ol' days".
While I obviously don't agree with the ideas presented back then, you've gotta respect the endevour of something like the Tractatus or the Principia.