The 2nd Plane Cover Story (Featuring Keith Wheelhouse, Joel Sucherman, & Vin Narayanan)

This is a 2011 update of a presentation that was originally released in May of 2008. Citizen Investigation Team exposes the dubious details surrounding reports of a 2nd plane that was allegedly following or "shadowing" the Pentagon attack jet until the moment it reached the building. CIT explains how the proven false "shadowing" report was blended with the true reports of a C-130 arriving a few minutes after the explosion. It features exclusive interviews with alleged witnesses Keith Wheelhouse, Joel Sucherman, and Vin Narayanan and in this 2011 version their accounts are contrasted with witnesses from Arlington Cemetery who saw the C-130 approach from a different direction a few minutes after the explosion, as well as with amateur video from the highway definitively establishing the approach timing.

• Category

  News & Politics

[Sydni Smedley]

Lyeytrip, I think i told you to get your head out of your ass for no good reason other than I misunderstood your comments on Citizen's Investigation. I am new to you guys. You are all still on the same side, right? Anyway, good job.

[Lion85]

Long story short...INSIDE JOB!

[Roger Cathey]

This guy is talking about 3 planes. The presenters don't mention this.

[Roger Cathey]

It's also obvious that by providing an 'over-abundance' of conflicting data, the result will be that people will shut down and take the easiest way out of such a conflict calling upon some judgement. Some measurement. The easiest conclusion: rely on 'experts', media (who only speculate and reduce everything serious to a kind of humorous 'oddity' of popular knowledge). Point of FACT is: After rejecting the conceived impossible, whatever remains, however improbable: is nearer fact. INVESTIGATE!

[Roger Cathey]

Yet the time element of adjustments to some physical media is obviously going to take more time, more energy. Now that everything is reduced to digital format means there is no longer any physical record. Just 'bit' and 'byte' SIMULATIONS. Not truly any 'record' at all due to the fact that anyone with a 'back-door' access to such can manipulate the data to fit some objective. There's nothing physical. Electromagnetic stream easily manipulated. Eye-witness testimony has been damned. FILM? Who?

[Roger Cathey]

When flight data is reduced to digital format, how difficult is it for anyone knowing what a 'bit' is, to imagine this form of record can be manipulated? Radar scopes, and film of scopes is another thing. Digital 'record' is meaningless. Any stream of 'digital record' can have a back-door. Some form of insertion by some programmer who's given him or herself a key for access to the data steam and also ability to adjust the data stream. Actual celluloid film of radar scopes 2 can be adjusted.