3 Reasons This Election Didn't Change A Thing

There's no question that the Republicans painted the map red during the 2010 midterm elections, picking up control of the House of Representatives, gaining share in the Senate, and picking up a good chunk of statehouses seemingly all over the place.

The Republicans won big due to huge voter displeasure with the state of the economy, President Obama's policies of the past two years, and (especially) the Democrat-controlled Congress. But does the shift in power matter? Here's three Reasons the GOP wave won't change a goddamn thing:

1. We're still on the fast track to the poor house. When the GOP ran the show with George W. Bush, they spent like drunken sailors (apologies to drunken sailors). Things have only gotten worse since 2008 but the GOP's much-ballyhooed (at least by themselves) Pledge to America only pledges to spend the least bit less than the Dems. The Pledge conspicuously exempted defense and entitlements from spending cuts, thereby taking more than 60 percent of outlays off the table and making it impossible to seriously cut spending. Triumphant GOP spokespeople sounded the same message on Election Day, generally refusing to offer up specifics about spending cuts.

2. Nobody's talking about foreign policy and ending the warfare state. In constant dollars, defense spending has basically doubled since 2000 and is projected to stay at levels hundreds of billions of dollars above what it was before the Cold War ended. Perhaps more important, neither President Obama nor his party's leadership has even begun a meaningful conversation about foreign policy. The same goes for the Republicans, who constantly exempt defense spending, one of the very largest annual items in the federal budget, from serious scrutiny, much less significant cuts. President Obama is following George W. Bush's painfully slow withdrawal plan from Iraq and has tripled down in Afghanistan without clarifying U.S. goals and leaving lots of wiggle room when it comes to supposed deadlines for leaving. The only folks more hellbent on maintaining an unexamined status quo than the president are the Republicans.

3. The only people worse than liberals on social issues are conservatives. President Obama and the Democrats spent more time hectoring Americans to eat our vegetables than they did repealing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," pushing immigration reform, or ending drug prohibition. But don't look for the new crew in D.C. or your state capitol to push social tolerance anytime soon. If anything - and despite all the limited-government rhetoric - they'll be even worse when it comes to expanding individual autonomy and increasing lifestyle choice.

The one up side to the midterms? Only that we don't have to worry about another election for two woefully short years.

"3 Reasons This Election Didn't Change a Thing!" is written and produced by Meredith Bragg and Nick Gillespie (who also hosts).

Go to http://reason.com/blog/2010/11/02/reasontv-3-reasons-this-electi for data on the above.

Go to http://reason.tv for downloadable versions of our videos and subscribe to Reason.tv's YouTube channel to receive automatic notification when new material goes live.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• reason
• reason.com
• reason.tv
• reason magazine
• reason foundation
• nick gillespie
• election 2010
• election
• congress
• republicans
• democrats
• three reasons
• 3 reasons
• midterm
• obama
• rand paul
• rubio
• boehner

[joshwhoisthatguy]

Isn't Rand Libertarian enough for a victory?

[tdrpowerl]

Ron Paul 2012!! if you are tired of all the political bullshit then he is the only candidate that makes sense!

[FRSFreeStateNow]

American Politics a lot of times is about cycles, a lot of times one party is up because the other party is down. Not because they are loved by the country. The last three elections are perfect examples of that.

[Beroean30]

#1 reason election really doesnt change anything is President is still Barack Obama. like in 2006 the election meant little Like what Bush did to Pelosi, if Obama doesnt like anything coming thru Congress, he can veto. And thats the end of story. But actually it may not even reach Obama. What the media and their bais towards foolishness dont tell you is that the Senate is much more powerful than the House and any bil the Senate doesnt like from the House they can let it die or vote it down.

[smb12321]

Our current plight is indeed our fault in that we allowed politicians to take the easy road. They promised program after program that will address virtually any human want - food, roads, health care, education, clean water, employment, housing, light bulbs - you name it, we've heard a promise that a new law is the answer.

How effing selfish can you get by sabotaging your kids' future with unsustainable debt for an unaffordable lifestyle?

[ChiotVulgaire]

Who cares at this point? Republican or democrat, we're spiraling out of control and we're not getting any better. Personally, I blame americans at large for their inability to agree on anything.

[MrMarinegold]

@joshua1auhsoj I agree with Ron Paul 90 percent of the time but he isn't electable

so stop with the Ron Paul fanboy worship. Are you a 911 truther?

[spitfire71068]

Sad but true.

[joshua1auhsoj]

@MrMarinegold no, but im sure he would have slowly waisted my tax money as well.

spying on us, going to unnessisary wars, doing nothing to the big buisness like BP for the oil spills and ruining the enviroment, permitting torture.... do you really think a President Ron Paul would pushed for any of these things??

in my opinion he would have been the best choice.

[MrMarinegold]

@joshua1auhsoj You really think a President Mccain would have pushed for the same type of healthcare takeover that Obama has successfully pushed over on the USA?