hovind debate

hovind takes three different evolutionist at the same time from different fields so they can not use the "that is not in my field" excuses this time.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• hovind
• kent
• debate
• evolution
• creation
• drdino
• science

[thelastroadrunner]

@Thegreenandwhitearmy The supposed evolutionary development of the human eye is based upon the notion that there is such a thing as a beneficial mutation. Not only has a beneficial mutation *never* been observed it is also a mathematical *impossibility*. It defies everything we know about nature. Entropy always increases. Macro-evolution proposes that Entropy is decreasing for some. What nonsense.

[thelastroadrunner]

@ianthegodking Evolution has *never* explained the diversity of life since there has *never* been any evidence for macro-evolution. Zero! If I'm wrong then give us here your best piece of evidence for macro-evolution. Just one piece of evidence. Here's my prediction... you're not going to provide one bit of evidence. Atheists are all the same. You're liars.

[thelastroadrunner]

@ianthegodking The key word in your statement is "imagine". Without imagination the fairytale of evolution completely evaporates. Its a false religion with no basis in demonstrable evidence whatsoever.

[thelastroadrunner]

@ianthegodking Less hair would mean a *loss* of information - a degenerative mutation. Macro-evolution requires beneficial mutations - a *gain* of information. This has *never* been observed.  EVER! There is no such thing as macro-evolution not even in the faculty of sight.

[thelastroadrunner]

@ianthegodking What on earth does the Pope have to do with Biblical Faith? Evolution is completely incompatable with God's inerrant Word.

But you're right about this... Evolution *is* a belief.

[thelastroadrunner]

@matthewtaylorbrown Kent doesn't need me to defend him. Im attacking anyone who condemns another person without intimate knowledge of the details of their life. You *implied* Kent is a "shyster". That's slander and makes you liable for a defamation suit. Im not like you because Im not assuming anything. Your own words are here for everyone to read. You *ARE* just like every other atheist in this post. The evidence is right in front of you.

[MrHoolits]

@Thegreenandwhitearmy.1.As a Christian there is no need to reject evolution as MORE than 2 of 3 accept evolution and believe in god.

2a. Hovind broke the Commandments of lying and stealing.

2b. We all agree that the government is taking our money and giving it to their evil cronies against us.

3. There isn't 1 creationist scientific peer review paper and there is no creation library, just the bible. The creation museum, I hate to tell is a joke with zero real science.

[Thegreenandwhitearmy]

@matthewtaylorbrown Can I just weigh in here. I am not defending tax evasion if he did it but also could see why the government would want to silence him or at least discredit him and put him out of business. If he did it then he should be in jail along with every other criminal but I honestly have my doubts. Keeping a list of bad Christian behaviour must be really tiring for you but no true Christian claims to be without fault. Every single person sins but born again Christians are forgiven.

[Thegreenandwhitearmy]

@ianthegodking Fair play to you, you seem to know your stuff, however your explanation for how the eye formed would be brilliant if there was only one eye in the world. Given raw materials, the correct climate, a long period of time, the correct sequence of events, the right amount of sun and rain etc etc it could be argued that a complex organ could form, but millions of similar complex organs all exactly the same, formed at different times, in different animals is so bizarre it blows my mind

[Thegreenandwhitearmy]

@MrHoolits 1. I do not want to reject science, just evolution.

2. I do not believe stealing is ok and never said that, the bible teaches it isn't but I can understand why someone would want to withhold paying tax if they thought the government was mis-spending it. I would not do it but understand why someone would want to.

3. There are also Creation libraries and museums filled to the rafters with evidence for anyone to see

4. I don't understand what you mean, sorry