http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=doe_KCAhMvI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wQoKaTfHSgU
A major story is breaking in climate science, after hackers posted a 61 megabyte data file on a Russian server that appears to be confidential emails and climate data hacked from the UK Met Office.
The data raises major questions about the role of scientists in what appears to be a deliberate conspiracy to mislead the public:
Those involved allegedly include: James Hansen, Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies; Michael Mann, famous for Mann's "Hockey Stick"; Gavin Schmidt, NASA climate modeler, and; Stephen Schneider, Stanford professor and Al Gore confidant.
A statement released Friday by the website RealClimate has confirmed that e-mail servers at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in Norwich, England, were hacked recently with contents illegally made available over the Internet.
Although the authenticity of all these e-mail messages has yet to be proven, what's currently available points to a coordinated attempt to manipulate climate data by those directly involved in advancing the theory of anthropogenic global warming.
New Zealand's Investigate magazine reported Friday that it has verified these e-mail messages are indeed real:
@ZombieHurd Try 500 trillion plus a year with immunity from any country and their laws....
NemesisOfStan 3 weeks ago
Wow you guys are dumb new flash THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLS EVREY THING the news the internet what you hear about them is what thay want you to hear its all part of something bigger
ZombieHurd 1 year ago
I am not sure how that wil help without doing some research into what Ba and Al will do to other things like clouds.
A lot of people thought corn-based biofuels were the solution until we found out that it made things worse. Of course the farm lobby wont let us take the subsidies away now.
drkstrong 2 years ago
I really appreciated this conversation and think the highest priority with regards to this debate of "climate change" should be disclosure of the military's fuel use
That's a uniting issue on both sides of this convoluted debate. It's idiotic for common people to pay carbon taxes if it's the military and frequent fliers who contribute the most CO2 in the upper atmosphere
Whats your view on jet vs. car emissions? Are you aware that the CFR suggests putting Ba and Al in jetfuel, to raise albedo?
ParapaDrifter 2 years ago
If true that puts the US back on top of the CO2 emissions table ahead of china as we spend more on our military than the rest of the world combined.
drkstrong 2 years ago
Then dont post ambiguous statements that if someone replies to can set an incccurate precident.
drkstrong 2 years ago
Humans could not change the earths climate if we had to. Billions have been wasted and criminal charges need to come next.
MarkFFHH 2 years ago 2
Q: who emits the most CO2 that effects the upper atmosphere, since CO2 is heavier than N2/O2?
A: Jets/military, this industry that is regulated. The Military-Industrial Complex. But do global warming alarmists ever point out that fact? NO no no. My guess is the money/corp power benefits from them to talk about it. They are exempt from national reporting requirements under U.S. law and the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Page: hubpages(.)com/hub/Who-Creates-the-Most-Co2-Emissions
ParapaDrifter 2 years ago
Don't split hairs with me. "regulate the amount of additional GHGs that we are dumping in the atmosphere." ~ thats the mechanism for regulating anthropogenic CO2, yes.
ParapaDrifter 2 years ago
You can't regulate the atmospheric content of CO2 or any other naturally occuring GHG. You can only regulate the amount of additional GHGs that we are dumping in the atmosphere.
drkstrong 2 years ago