Truth Decay part 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
605 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 9, 2009

Part 2 of 2 of a lecture entitled "Truth Decay" by Dr. Doug Groothuis, Professor of Philosophy of Religion at Denver Seminary.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The burden of proof is for Doug to critique those in his own camp to demonstrate how his theoretical absolutes have actually translated into more than metaphysical advantages.

    It does no good to contrast the Christian worldview with the worst non-Christian worldview such as Stalin or Pol Pot. And assuming that Atheists don't believe in absolutes is not representing Atheism as a whole.

    His argument is that since Atheism can't account for absolutes then the hypothesis of God must be true.

  • Doug's argument  would be more convincing if Christians could agree what those absolutes actually were.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more