Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

other peoples money gregory peck

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
11,911
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 17, 2009

No description available.

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Both speeches are so true, but in the end Devito's character was right. It wasn't about destroying a company just to destroy it, it was about being honest with the shareholders that the company was a dinosaur in a new world. Fiber optics (advancement), dvd players (advancement) cell phones (advancement). It is simple human desire to continue to explore new and better ways of living and doing things. If not, we'd all still be living in caves. Greed is not always a bad thing.

  • They both has some strong points. In defence of Gregory, people are important. A socialist program is good for the economy. People thrown on the street is bad. They need a financial transition period and reschooling. Danny is right. It's just poor practice to keep something that's dead. Business is business. About greed: Corporate greed is BAD. The money will NOT trickle down. It will go to bonuses etc. Consumer greed=GOOD. that means businesses has a market.

see all

All Comments (24)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This says it all..whthe US was and can be great..by my man Gregorey Peck

  • Gregory Peeeeck!!  <3

  • is this movie worth watching?

  • "Playing God with other people's money"

    I wonder if anyone making that movie realizes that description fits Socialism...

  • "when the Yen is weaker and the dollar is stronger"

    Oh dear. He doesnt know anything about fractional reserve banking and inflation. Money As Debt or Money Banking and the Federal Reserve are two great documentires.

    Id have to see this movie again. Last time i seen it i was a kid> now ive got an education its hard to tell from two short speeches whos in the right and whos in the worng

  • @ToonScheur Gregory Peck is right, all he needs is to retool the company to produce new products from it's main material, wires and cables, and that requires time and money. Danny is wrong because he knows that the company needs only to be retooled and that will neutralize his argument. Look at the iron and steel industry, from iron it went to steel, then to weathering high strength low alloy steels now in used today in many industries. Time and money for retooling and upgrading is the key.

  • @indianajoe219 fiber optics cannot replace copper in power cables that powers the fiber optics internet network, nor fiber optics can replace the copper in power generators used to generate power to power the fiber optics. Fiber optics cannot be used as heat dissipation fins and cooling pipes to help cool the internet equipment that sends information through fiber optics. Beryllium-copper alloys are almost unbreakable and used to protect fiber optics wires and cables.

  • What really surprises me is the sheer ignorance of the shareholder's who have chosen to sell their shares in the company, their shares has value because of the company's physical existence as a physical-economic asset backing up their shares. But when they sold their shares for paper money backed by nothing, and this process is repeated tens of thousands of times in other industries, then their paper money will become eventually worthless. Short term gain at the expense of long term prosperity.

  • Money by itself alone is worthless. It is only made worthy if backed by a physical-economy which is inherently manufacturing by nature and manufacturing is when you build something. Money is just a representative of wealth, a convenient means to facilitate exchange of physical goods and physical services made by manufacturing alone and is not wealth by itself. Look at nations with well managed and regulated physical-economic based economies and they are still persevering the economic crises.

  • Of what use is money if it is not backed by real productivity that produces real physical tangible assets and services? Real wealth is inherently physical and tangible by nature which is accomplished by manufacturing industries and manufacturing services alone. Money is just a representative of wealth and not wealth itself, money alone is worthless if not backed by real productivity which is inherently manufacturing by nature, manufacturing is when you build things and not print worthless money.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more