Ron Paul vs Lawrence O'Donnell pt. 2

MSNBC Teleprompter Reader Attempts to Ambush Ron Paul

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com

kalifornya1
October 14, 2010

It is yet another example of how the corporate media will lie and break agreements in order to accomplish its overarching mission — to denigrate and tear down any political candidate who will endeavor to break the stranglehold of mega-corporations and banks over the political life of the nation. Earlier in the week Texas Republican Ron Paul ventured into enemy territory when he agreed to appear on the Lawrence O'Donnell show on MSNBC, the same network that ambushed his son and attempted to portray him as a member of the Ku Klux Klan opposed to the Civil Rights Act. The corporate media immediately took its cue from the Maddow "interview" — actually a drive-by attempt at character assassination — and ran back-to-back segments designed to make Paul out to be a racist. The wife of former Federal Reserve mob boss Alan Greenspan, Andrea Mitchell, declared the attempt to destroy Ran Paul was "a game changing interview." It was nothing of the sort. Rand Paul leads the race in Kentucky.

David Gregory of "Meet the Press" called Rand's comments "pretty far out view even for those on the right" and professional character assassin Chris Matthews went on "Leno" to bash Paul as "a philosopher and philosophers shouldn't run for office." * A d v e r t i s e m e n t *

Instead of philosophers, we get a lickspittles for the establishment.

Matthews' job is to steer people away from the fact that Obama and the Democrats are no different than Bush and the Republicans. Both work for the banksters. Both support forever war and the ongoing effort to erect pyres of dead bodies in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and soon enough Iran.

Is it any wonder Delaware's Christine O'Donnell has refused to be interviewed by the establishment media after it dredged up and ancient video clip and attempted to make her out as a witch?

If you doubt MSNBC is a cheerleader for mass murder in far away lands, consider the fact the network dropped Jesse Ventura like a rock back in 2003 when he dared oppose the illegal and immoral invasion of Iraq. They canceled "Jesse Ventura's America" in response to his principled opposition. Obviously, Jesse is too much of a philosopher for MSNBC, a network owned by General Electric. GE is one of the world's top three producers of jet engines, supplying Boeing, Lockheed Martin and other military aircraft makers for the powering of airplanes and helicopters that kill brown people in "rogue states."

Lawrence O'Donnell's lecturing Ron Paul on "freedom" — as mandated by government at gunpoint — is hypocrisy at its worst. The CIA infiltrated corporate media is not a purveyor of freedom and liberty. It is a slick, multi-billion dollar propaganda apparatus designed to trick people into support the establishment and its foreign wars. The false right-left paradigm exercised 24/7 on the corporate media networks is a distraction. It is a slight of hand devised to distract people as the ruling elite roll out their global slave and surveillance grid.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• infowars moneybomb
• Infowars.com

[urrejhipokritet]

@Noromongrel bigoted views? wtf?

[AcedMoney777]

@xsach1 who said he votes for funding of military budgets when he's voted against such appropriation bills? Weapons manufacturers go nowhere bud, they do what they've always done, sell guns to the people/consumer. The weapons manufacturers that profiteer from the wars will be done with considering there would be no more business from us to them so their assets would subsequently be liquidated.

[louisrr01]

@xsach1 But HYE, "tjhe wars would be over." Yeah RIGHT, PAUL votes for funding of military budgets but he wants to stop the wars? And WHAT HAPPENES to ALL the weapons manufacturers in this country? Give us a break you must have wars in order to sell and test your products, right? Andfind an outlet for frustration.

Sad but true, check your history.

Besides, I beleive there is one war left, and that should be over in 2014.

[louisrr01]

@xsach1 That would be the ONLY reason? "He wants to stop the wars?" THEBN when the wars are over? Fuck the people they are on their own? "Everyman for himself," INDIVIDIDUAL rights?

yeah a GROUP of people (the US--nation--a group) will GO FAR with a philosophy that say "I got mine so..."

[hiramspiral82]

@louisrr01

i went and dug her up just to double check--all i saw was a meal worm moving about. must be your prick.

[louisrr01]

@dcshipman "You don't have rights becasue you belong to a group?" since when?

How about christians, are they a group? do they have rights as a group?

Yelling "check with your staff about YOUR agreements?" What he was not expecting a debate? Just shut up and LISTEN.

[louisrr01]

@dcshipman He was calling Paul out on the comments he made regarding "the TRUE progressive understand what I am saying?" "The civil rights act did not enhance freedom?" "Taking over private property?" "Did not enhance freedom?"

"Freedom philosphy brings people together?" What does THAT mean? Can YOU translate? Treating everyone as an individual? "Economic and personal liberty are all in the same?" Demogogue this?

"It took activist liberal Washington government..."

[louisrr01]

@dcshipman This has nothing to do with Obama, so I don't see the relationship. Lawrence is merely attacking his talking points and Paul is spouting BS, making snide comments (listen) and "you don't understand that, but that is ok, others do."

you see, Lawrence put Paul's ass to the fire, and was hoping he could spout some BS and Lawrence would let him.

He bitch-slapped Paul and YOU can plainly see that. Paul is fluff and gets UPSET if people don't fall for that BS.

[louisrr01]

@dcshipman RON PAUL is a ranter.

I AGREE with his position about ending wars overseas, but I think you MIGHT want to read MORE about libertarian doctrine. He is NOT a libertarian. He got that leadership position because he SOUND like he is TEACHING you something you don't know (most likely). LISTEN TO HIS WORDS. He is saying nothing and making snide remarks to O'Donnell. But Lawrence is not putting up with that BS and calling him out on it.

[louisrr01]

@dcshipman I don't know what you mean by "Obama was never treated like this." I do know that it would be impossible to argue with you because your mind is made up and most likely, you are unwilling to analyze the conversatin in-depth.

Paul is a good talker, he SOUNDS like he KNOWs what he is talking about. He is NOT an economist he was an OB-GYN doctor. Then he became a congressman. PERIOD.