Perhaps the question we should be asking is that of 'motive'.
What do the anthropogenic G.W. proselytizers stand to gain by their apocalyptic scare mongering?
And, conversely, what do the GW skeptics stand to gain?
What about: the UN, the EU, governments, utilities, corporations, filmmakers, media moguls, newspaper columnists, filmmakers, to name but a few 'concerned parties'?
Few of us can competently scrutinize climate science. But we can
unveil the real motives behind its sale or denial.
Runaway climate change in the opposite direction that he is thinking. Nature controls climate and man.
david222444 9 months ago
Moonbat
ToddonCapeCod 3 years ago
Perhaps the question we should be asking is that of 'motive'.
What do the anthropogenic G.W. proselytizers stand to gain by their apocalyptic scare mongering?
And, conversely, what do the GW skeptics stand to gain?
What about: the UN, the EU, governments, utilities, corporations, filmmakers, media moguls, newspaper columnists, filmmakers, to name but a few 'concerned parties'?
Few of us can competently scrutinize climate science. But we can
unveil the real motives behind its sale or denial.
NaeWea 3 years ago