Biblical Glasses
Uploader Comments (hairyreasoner)
Top Comments
-
I love the dog, he's a good actor. Very good story, I love the bit about the dog eating the buffet, really clever. 5 stars!!!
-
had to watch this one again hairy. a classic video my friend :)
All Comments (157)
-
Dave need to start one of dem dar in Mississippi.
-
Friendly, simple, illustrative. Without taking the argument to overly intellectual levels and keeping it to realms of conversation that your average believer can keep up with, I think this is possibly one of the best arguments for the dissolution of christianity, and by extent, other religions, simply because it is so easy to relate to aforementioned believers. Way to go hairyreasoner :)
-
Perfectly done. ★★★★★
Katalyzt
-
This is hilarious!!! Thank you! :O)
-
You're dog is so cute and well behaved. He deserved all that pizza. <3
-
As your Creation Science research and methodology is exactly equal to that of Mr. Ham, I couldn't decide to whom I should send the check. But, I was told that when Gramma died, she was cremated, and is now in Heaven with God. So I wrote out a check for $27,000 (USD) and cremated it. The check is now also in Heaven. God can decide who gets it- you or Ham. If you're BOTH wrong about the Earth being less than a million years old, nobody gets it.
-
I don't need bible glasses, im already blind
-
@Jesusgospel lol wut?
-
Excellent!
-
Brilliant stuff. My cheque is in the mail and god willing you should receive it any day now.
This comment has received too many negative votes show
The creation story in Genesis 2 was for Adam. God Created Adam then put him in the garden.
Then God Created more animals so that Adam would see it and know he was God. Just a little warning Be not decide GOD is not mocked, for whatsoever a man soeth that shall he also reap.
Jesusgospel 2 years ago
Genesis 1 and 2 clearly had different authors. This explains the contradictions.
It also points out, quite clearly, that God was, at best, just one of them.
There is no evidence at all in support of (and quite a pile to the contrary) the presupposition that He was even a co-author.
hairyreasoner 2 years ago
Why
tolleck 2 years ago
Why what?
hairyreasoner 2 years ago
What? What do you mean, why what?
helgihg 2 years ago
I mean How and Who.
Not to mention When?
hairyreasoner 2 years ago