Sen. Clinton on the Employee Free Choice Act
Top Comments
All Comments (54)
-
Isnt it interesting videos like this get mostly thumbs up but in the comments are vastly and detailed in being against this Big Lie of "Free Choice"?
-
This is their attempt to bring in a dictatorship...which is what the New World Order is all about. Their trying to turn us into China. When to get up. When to work. Where to go. Where to worship. America cannot go this route, because most other countries are turning to socialism and anarchy(i.e. Mexico with the organized drug cartels).
-
A friend of mine earned not one, but two degrees in advertising. All she could find were minimum wage jobs. I assure you, if those jobs were organized by the GCIU, they wouldn't be minimum wage jobs!
-
Here is a true story about my experience with a union. Was in Vegas 3 years ago for a large event and we had spent a lot of $ for the event and everything was done via a union shop. The program was printed and one one employee we did not put his middle initial in ti. The union required us to reprint the whole program. $6,750 later, we NEVER used a union since. I saw this union employee and on his floor tag- no middle initial. It is stuff like this that turns employers off from unions.
-
No dought they try to steel elections in meny other way! first line of defence from voter fraud is the secret ballot. only mislead fools and crooks want to do away with the secret ballot!!!
-
The secret ballot is a red herring. Google red herring! Then wise up!
-
None of that has any thing to do with thugs wanting to intimidate the voting. The secret ballot is the issue. The curtain behind you lets you vote your mind with confidents. Voter fraud is a certain with out the secret ballot! The curtain will not stop you from organizing.
-
NO !!! The point was to protect union members who felt ripped off or misrepresented by their leaders. If you did not want your money to go to democrats it was your choice.
-
If the middle class was REALLY shrinking, and wages have been stagnant in all sectors since the 1970s, far more people would be for a bill like EFCA (even though it's deceptively named), believe me. The fact that union membership isn't all that high these days just shows that a) Americans have comfortable job security and wages and don't want them and b) they're fed up with union bosses nonsense, like donating dues to political candidates without their consent.
I don't see how taking away the rights of potential union members to vote in private will help them.
jeffmagic32 3 years ago 5
Correct. You cannot be for the so-called "Employee Free Choice Act" and also claim to be for individual liberty. They are mutually exclusive. If you support the legislation you are a statist/socialist.
Windsor2k 3 years ago 3