Popular Mechanics 9 11 lies EXPOSED!

IT HAS BEGUN! THE TRUTH WILL FINALLY BE PRESSED INTO YOUR LAZY BRAINS!

Hello, this is your Capatin speaking, you are now officially on board of the REVOLUTION. It is goingto be a quick and painfull, but very VERY healing process. Soon we will enjoy free energy from hydrogen cells, soon Ron Paul will be President, because he earns trust and actually really wants the best for the people. Prepare to witness Snowball effect of proportions you couldnt even imagine. A TruthBall so to speak...

Category:

Education

Tags:

• A&E
• for
• 911
• Truth
• North
• Tower
• exploding
• and
• pulverizing
• BBC
• Reports
• WTC7
• Fell
• Before
• It
• Happens
• Bill
• Cooper
• on
• BREAKING
• NEWS
• Chemist
• talks
• about
• the
• findings
• of
• explosives
• in
• dust
• from
• World
• Popular
• Mechanics
• 9-11
• lies
• EXPOSED!

[ReallyRealOrWhat]

yah they found dna but couldnt find 4 big orange titanium boxes with the flight recorders.what a crock of shit

[donovan93123]

911 = MOSSAD JOB

Modern day Lavon Affair

[kevin21122]

@kevin21122 Steven E Jones is probably the most trust worthy witness in the whole investigation! He is a well esteblished Phyisists and he investigated the evidence he had and he using the scientific method concluded that the only way the buildings could have come down is ( Highest probability!! Therm-ate or explosives, ) The chance that they collapsed the way the Government claims is very low probability!) If We can figure out Quantum Mechanics 9/11 should be easy to put together

[kevin21122]

@CMO999 if you want to find out weather somthing is true you use a philisophical model that is well established at testing the credibility of a claim! that would be the scientific method! It is a well established objective method used to establish a claim into a fact! The government did not use the scientific method in their investigation. If they did we have the right to see the report and repeat the findings and put the evidence back together to test weather it is truthful!!

[CMO999]

@paolojustice I don't have a firm opinion either way, but when I see fanaticism in someone it tends to make me question their objectivity.

[CMO999]

@paolojustice The fact is, if you want something to be true, anything at all, whatever it may be, you will always find ways of rationalizing it and making it true. It doesn't bode well for your side to be using these rhetorical kinds of tactics. I could phone up some "Truther" and ask a bunch of confusing questions and declare it as a victory, then you would see what I am saying. Calling someone an "idiot" and so on whenever you disagree about something is not convincing either.

[paolojustice]

@CMO999 He had NO! answers to any of the questions, WHY? because if you lie in the beginning you cannot have any memory of a truthful experience.

[CMO999]

So some editor blundered. you expect him to have all the answers about everything off the top of his head, otherwise your theory must be true. Reminds me of creationists.

[roquefortfiles]

@HardcoreJungFunk Says who? YOU? The guy who built this structure, sat at a desk for 3 years, worked out the load distributions said "It would collapse instantly.. and it wouldn't be a slow failure"..

You think Les Robertson is pulling numbers out of thin air when he puts together the load calculations for this structure? Making it up as he goes?

If there is one person in all of this who understands IMPLICITLY what is going to constitute a failure overload.

Robertson is that person