@MSH786 There's a difference between Malcolm X and MLK. X embraced a violent ideology against those who suppressed blacks based off of the teachings of his new found faith. Islam teaches to strike back at your enemies, after all. MLK's protest was inspired by Gandhi's civil disobedience, which opposed violence, and as a Christian, knew to turn the other cheek. MLK is a much higher respected individual than X will ever be.
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD you made a valid point mate. However the highest authority in islam Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al-Asheikh denounced terrorism and terrorists called to Jihad. I agree with you. "HOWEVER SHARIA STATES THAT IT CANNOT BE IMPOSED ON NON-MUSLIM COUNTRIES WERE MUSLIMS ARE THE MINORITY. INSTEAD IF MUSLIMS WANT SHARIA TO BE THE LAW OF THE LAND THEY MUST LEAVE TO AN ARAB MUSLIM COUNTRY WERE BY CONSENSUS PEOPLE DEMAND SHARIA"
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD There was a time when religious extremism was tolerated because it did not pose too much of a danger to the continuation of civilization. But now the peace and prosperity of the world is being seriously threatened by extremists who believe in using violence to promote and defend Islam. They believe that secular forms of government are a violation of God’s sovereignty over the earth, therefore all nations must submit themselves to the rule of Islamic theocracy
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD The overwhelming majority of Muslims today ignore the violent teachings in the Koran by putting them into historical context, just like most Jews put the violent teachings of their holy scriptures into historical context. But there are also many Muslims who oppose democracy and freedom of speech because they fear that modern democratic values will eventually replace conservative Islamic ones.
@nimrod959 ok man. i get it. you live in the 21st century. US MUSLIMS WILL LIVE IN THE 7TH CENTURY ISLAMIC LAW. AND DONT WORRY SHARIA LAW WILL NEVER COME TO THE WEST UNTIL CONSENSUS DEMANDS SUCH.
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD Look if you want to live in the 7th Century Caliphate then I suggest you do so, but if you want to live in the real world and join us in the 21st Century, then Islam and all Religions for that matter have no place in Politics and Law. Perhaps the Quran was a relatively progressive document in the year 632, but Sharia Law now is just one long human rights violation
@nimrod959 PLEASE ALL YOU HAVE SAID IS FROM THE MEDIA. NEVER IN YOUR LIFE YOU HAVE ACTUALLY PICK AN ISLAMIC BOOK OF FIQH SO STOP PRETENDING YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT SHARIA. WHAT YOU KNOW IS FROM UN-ISLAMIC WEBSITES AND WHAT THE MEDIA SAYS, AND YOU SWALLOW IT ALL. I KNOW SHARIA IS NOT LIKE WHAT YOU SAY BECAUSE I STUDY ISLAM. AND BEFORE I BECAME A MUSLIM I WAS A CHRISTIAN WHO STUDIED ISLAM AND FOUND THE MEDIA TO BE THE LIARS. IN THE PROCESS I FELT COMPELLED TO ACCEPT ISLAM BECAUSE IT'S RIGHTEOUSNES
@nimrod959 DUDE IF YOU CALL THE LAWS THAT GOD REVALED THROUGH MOSES , JESUS AND MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UNTO ALL THESE GREAT PROPHETS) BARBARIC THEN YOU DONT BELIEVE IN GOD. I DONT CARE IF YOU CALL IT BARBARIC. THROUGH ALL THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH GOD HAS REVEALED THE SAME PUNISHMENT FOR HOMOSEXUALITY AND FORNICATION. AND UNDER THE KHALIFA AND UNDER THE RULE OF THE RIGHTEOUS, JEWS AND CHRISTIANS LIVED UNDER SHARIA LAW. AND EVERYONE WHO TRANSGRESS WHETHER MUSLIM, JEW OR CHRISTIAN WAS PUNISHED THE SAME.
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD Sharia law justifies shocking acts of barbarity including stoning, the execution of homosexuals, and the subjugation of women. Sharia does not permit freedom of conscience; it prohibits Muslims from renouncing their Islamic faith or converting to another religion.
Sharia does not support religious liberty; it treats non-Muslims as inferior and does not accord them the same protections as Muslims.
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD The Constitution of the United States in Article VI declares itself “the supreme law of the land.” No foreign laws can supersede our own Constitution and laws. Our First Amendment was never meant to protect sedition or insurgency
@MSH786 There's a difference between Malcolm X and MLK. X embraced a violent ideology against those who suppressed blacks based off of the teachings of his new found faith. Islam teaches to strike back at your enemies, after all. MLK's protest was inspired by Gandhi's civil disobedience, which opposed violence, and as a Christian, knew to turn the other cheek. MLK is a much higher respected individual than X will ever be.
ManOnFia 7 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD you made a valid point mate. However the highest authority in islam Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul Aziz bin Abdullah Al-Asheikh denounced terrorism and terrorists called to Jihad. I agree with you. "HOWEVER SHARIA STATES THAT IT CANNOT BE IMPOSED ON NON-MUSLIM COUNTRIES WERE MUSLIMS ARE THE MINORITY. INSTEAD IF MUSLIMS WANT SHARIA TO BE THE LAW OF THE LAND THEY MUST LEAVE TO AN ARAB MUSLIM COUNTRY WERE BY CONSENSUS PEOPLE DEMAND SHARIA"
ServantoftheTRUEGOD 11 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD There was a time when religious extremism was tolerated because it did not pose too much of a danger to the continuation of civilization. But now the peace and prosperity of the world is being seriously threatened by extremists who believe in using violence to promote and defend Islam. They believe that secular forms of government are a violation of God’s sovereignty over the earth, therefore all nations must submit themselves to the rule of Islamic theocracy
nimrod959 11 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD The overwhelming majority of Muslims today ignore the violent teachings in the Koran by putting them into historical context, just like most Jews put the violent teachings of their holy scriptures into historical context. But there are also many Muslims who oppose democracy and freedom of speech because they fear that modern democratic values will eventually replace conservative Islamic ones.
nimrod959 11 months ago
@nimrod959 ok man. i get it. you live in the 21st century. US MUSLIMS WILL LIVE IN THE 7TH CENTURY ISLAMIC LAW. AND DONT WORRY SHARIA LAW WILL NEVER COME TO THE WEST UNTIL CONSENSUS DEMANDS SUCH.
ServantoftheTRUEGOD 11 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD Look if you want to live in the 7th Century Caliphate then I suggest you do so, but if you want to live in the real world and join us in the 21st Century, then Islam and all Religions for that matter have no place in Politics and Law. Perhaps the Quran was a relatively progressive document in the year 632, but Sharia Law now is just one long human rights violation
nimrod959 11 months ago
@nimrod959 PLEASE ALL YOU HAVE SAID IS FROM THE MEDIA. NEVER IN YOUR LIFE YOU HAVE ACTUALLY PICK AN ISLAMIC BOOK OF FIQH SO STOP PRETENDING YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT SHARIA. WHAT YOU KNOW IS FROM UN-ISLAMIC WEBSITES AND WHAT THE MEDIA SAYS, AND YOU SWALLOW IT ALL. I KNOW SHARIA IS NOT LIKE WHAT YOU SAY BECAUSE I STUDY ISLAM. AND BEFORE I BECAME A MUSLIM I WAS A CHRISTIAN WHO STUDIED ISLAM AND FOUND THE MEDIA TO BE THE LIARS. IN THE PROCESS I FELT COMPELLED TO ACCEPT ISLAM BECAUSE IT'S RIGHTEOUSNES
ServantoftheTRUEGOD 11 months ago
@nimrod959 DUDE IF YOU CALL THE LAWS THAT GOD REVALED THROUGH MOSES , JESUS AND MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UNTO ALL THESE GREAT PROPHETS) BARBARIC THEN YOU DONT BELIEVE IN GOD. I DONT CARE IF YOU CALL IT BARBARIC. THROUGH ALL THE ABRAHAMIC FAITH GOD HAS REVEALED THE SAME PUNISHMENT FOR HOMOSEXUALITY AND FORNICATION. AND UNDER THE KHALIFA AND UNDER THE RULE OF THE RIGHTEOUS, JEWS AND CHRISTIANS LIVED UNDER SHARIA LAW. AND EVERYONE WHO TRANSGRESS WHETHER MUSLIM, JEW OR CHRISTIAN WAS PUNISHED THE SAME.
ServantoftheTRUEGOD 11 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD Sharia law justifies shocking acts of barbarity including stoning, the execution of homosexuals, and the subjugation of women. Sharia does not permit freedom of conscience; it prohibits Muslims from renouncing their Islamic faith or converting to another religion.
Sharia does not support religious liberty; it treats non-Muslims as inferior and does not accord them the same protections as Muslims.
nimrod959 11 months ago
@ServantoftheTRUEGOD The Constitution of the United States in Article VI declares itself “the supreme law of the land.” No foreign laws can supersede our own Constitution and laws. Our First Amendment was never meant to protect sedition or insurgency
nimrod959 11 months ago