Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The same 11 and 10 inch trackways found 80 miles away along corridor

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,150
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 12, 2008

I am looking at my database and determine that this area would be a good place to look. I arrive and find the same 11 and 10 inch tracks that I had found some 80 miles away. I determined that these were the same individuals by cast comparison, Dr Jeff Meldrum agrees with my observation. They were crossing through this valley where fisherman were prior to their arrival, this is something I have seen before with these individuals. Look at the tracks objectively could you take off your shoe and duplicate this? There is a lot going on anatomically/physiologically. (sp?) The first print you see the ball of the foot has a trianglular shape which means it was pulling inwards or medial. You can clearly see what looks like a fat pad which would be needed of a bipedal creature traversing over rough terrain. I have noted this "fat pad" in other castings changing shape and position based on terrain, trajectory, and placement of weight. many animals use fat pads for different reasons like the camel hump for holding water to the human foot with a minimal fat pad used to cushion the shock of walking. The pinky toe is placed out freely unlike those of a shoe wearing society. Take a look at your pinky toe... Does it curl in like most shoe wearer's? This foot does not appear that it has been constrained by shoes.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (4jaimeavalos)

  • Yeah. I see human prints. Same size as your bootprints. I want my five minutes of life back. There is nothing unusual about those prints, other than someone who has arch problems.

  • It is not arch problems that you are seeing but the midtarsal break. Check out my blogs and search my archives you will see the same group of 4 track's I have been casting since 2007. I have cast about 80 so far. I only cast the most detailed of their right and left at each site. This is how I can validate that they are from the same ones.

see all

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • GOOD VIDEO!good luck in your research

  • Cryptozoology novel  see video book trailer

  • It's unusual how the heel is very flat and doesn't dig into the sand like a human foot would.

  • Actually I think you are to lenient on the people who come on her and give you grief. Keep up the good work.

  • My exact thoughts. I have photos of a 14 inch that I have only picked up a couple of times and if I am reading the tracks right they can jump great distances. I also wonder if they are smart enough to opportunize on human arrogance with us thinking that they are human tracks and not questioning why someone would be walking in such cold and harsh conditions and at such high elevations and great distances.

  • Great insight something I have pondered. They may also understand that the normal human will write these off as human without ever thinking it through. It is most likely a learned behavior.

  • it actually makes a lot of sense as to why you aren't encountering a lot of the stereotypical BF foot print - 18". The older the squatch the longer they have been around and learned to cover their tracks or which routes to take to stay out of human contact. Young squatches either haven't learned or are less careful - therefore lots of smaller finds.

  • No logic at all. You are doing great research and you will find many arm chair "researchers" who try to bait you and dis you. You don't and IMO shouldn't respond to these people - let them doubt - that's fine - they aren't the ones out hiking and documenting - you have nothing to prove to them - only yourself.

  • You are absolutely right. He started skepitcal then became a total jackass. You will find much envy in this endeavor mostly from those with nothing to show. To me castings are hard evidence. A lot of people don't really understand what it would take to fake a trackway. A master craftsman would need to hike many heavy varied casts of the original and have them correspond with the substrate it is crossing all in hopes that someone finds them in the middle of nowhere? Not much logic to that.

  • sure you did. Entertaining healthy skeptics is one thing, there is no reason to entertain haters that hate for the sake of hating.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more