Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Iglesia ni Cristo - Why do you trust apostates?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,621
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 29, 2009

This video deals with the composition of the New Testament Canon and why it should be trusted, especially if its complication was decided upon by apostates (at least according to INC). INC believes that the Church of Christ apostated in the first century and that true believers disappeared completely. This leaves only the "apostates" left to compile the new testament, but why trust them? I would like to recieve some answers.

Link to Fundamental Beliefs of Iglesia ni Cristo:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_Beliefs_of_the_Iglesia_ni_Cristo

Link to Pasugo:
http://www.examineiglesianicristo.com/apostasy1.html

Links to the Council of Carthage:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_of_Carthage
http://www.bible-researcher.com/carthage.html

Link to St. Athanasius:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athanasius_of_Alexandria#New_Testament_canon

Link to the Development of the New Testament:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Development_of_the_New_Testament_canon

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (73)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Isn't it interesting how cults very often appeal to the apostatising of the Church to justify their legitimacy? Jehovah's Witnesses do it, Mormons do it.INC oes it. Also, have you noticed that the INC temples look very similar to those of Mormonism?

  • @lyon2k If the angels in Rev was like they belive-humans, Then they have to be ressurected as heavnly angles to seal the 12 tribes of Israel... Good luck. and The Rising of the Sun- anotles heliu, in Revelation 7,2 is the same as in revelation 16:9 And there its the Kings who are going to make war on Harmageddon, the last battle. So if theyr saying the greek term -.anotole heliu is Philippines then the Kings have to be from philippines as well? In context they are evil Kings aginst Christ coming

  • @lyon2k - Lamsa bible use church of Chirst in Acts 20:28. Lamsa was a ocutist. Not to be trusted. The greek text use Theos (God) as King James do. = church of God. Read the last sentence and they totally contradict themself. -Which he has purchased with HES own blood. Wow God did that? Hows that possible? Bec the human Jesus is one(hen) with the Father. They are 2 yet 1 God. But the best is to prove the veres about Felix is not in the Bible. Bec thats their foundation. -

  • INC has so many twists to the bible its scary. Its one of the worst organizations, the more I study it. They listen to preachers and swallow all, even if they didnt check the bible themselves. In acts 17, they searched the spriptures daily if what Paul and the oter one said to them. Likewise we have to. In general they are decieved by Satan.The Church for many is a place in relationship and good place so they treasure it. And makes them very proud. God cant work with proud people. James 4:6. -

  • @bigredphenom

    I think you are letting your ego blind you from realizing your errors. You never gave evidence for why you believe "all" religions are delusional and dangerous. I was even willing to engage you in the God debate. Man, I was so eager to do that. I even gave you another shot. What did you do? You let blew it! Not only are you a classic troll, but you are also a coward.

  • @Mkvine yep you lost mate. I gave you plenty to work with yet you refused to address any of it. I gave you proof yet you still pretend I havent, and now you put on this "(:" as a pitiful defense mechanism/cover up. Your jeebus looks down at you with shame. Atheism-1 Religion-0

  • @bigredphenom

    No, I do think you are a troll. You're just in denial. But I will be generous and give you one more shot. Make it worthwhile ;)

  • @bigredphenom

    The only ignoramus is the one who claims "ALL" religions are delusional and dangerous, but then does not proceed to substantiate that claim when challenged. I know you want to get into debating God, I do too. I know you're running away but I will not let you get away with this. Either provide your evidence for that claim or say you don't have any. Then we can proceed to talk about the new topic you side-stepped to (God). So please, quit tap dancing and back up what you say.

  • @Mkvine you accuse me of sidestepping when the only one who has is you. Only an an ignoramus would ask for "proof" on how religions are delusional and dangerous. The proof is all around you, you are just in denial. But despite this, I have proven it any way just to appease you. You know this, yet you pretend as if you dont so you can have your strawman. Asinine indeed.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more