Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Wicked Billionaire's Depopulation Club

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
46,851
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 1, 2009

WASHINGTON - Some of the richest men and women in the world met secretly recently in New York to conspire on using their vast wealth to bring the world's population growth under control. The meeting included some of the biggest names in the "billionaires
club," according to the London Times - Bill Gates, David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The meeting at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel Prize-winning biochemist and president of Rockefeller University, was the inspiration of Gates and took place three weeks ago.
"The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at 'security briefings,'" the Times reported today. Stacy Palmer, editor of the Chronicle of Philanthropy, speculated that the secrecy surrounding the meeting may have been due to concern that "they don't want to be seen as a global cabal." Get the inside story on the globalist insiders who have been meeting for decades in highly guarded secret. Learn from author who penetrated
Bilderbergers According to the Times, the billionaires were each given 15 minutes to present their favorite cause. Over dinner they discussed how they might
settle on an "umbrella cause" that could harness their interests. Taking their cue from Gates, the report said, they agreed population control was
the No. 1 issue. In February, Gates, 53, outlined an ambitious plan to cap global population at 8.3 billion - about one billion fewer than currently projected. Patricia Stonesifer, former chief executive of the Bill and Melinda
Gates Foundation, said the billionaires would continue to meet over the next
few months.

A guest at the meeting told the Times population growth would be
addressed as a potentially disastrous environmental, social and industrial
threat.

"This is something so nightmarish that everyone in this group agreed
it needs big-brain answers," said the guest. "They need to be independent of
government agencies, which are unable to head off the disaster we all see
looming."

As to secrecy, the guest said, "They wanted to speak rich to rich
without worrying anything they said would end up in the newspapers, painting
them as an alternative world government."

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • If the governments would stop causing catastrophes like oil spills in the golf for example & quit trying to convince people that the world is in trouble when IT'S NOT, everyone would see that it's all a bunch of BULL SHIT. This is how the elite & politicians are getting richer. They're greedy & want everything. They will do whatever it takes to get rid of us so that they have more for themselves. Even though there is plenty to go around for everyone. Greed, that's why man can't govern himself.

  • TO CONCLUDE QUICKLY: THEY MUST BE EXTERMINATED, KILLED !

    SHOULD BE WIPED OUT THE EARTH !

    DEATH SENTENCE FOR THIS SATANIC SEED!!

see all

All Comments (331)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The poor have a disproportionate number of children because they know that productive people will pay to take care of them. 200 years age 500 million people, now 7 billion. Sterilization is better than genocide. I don't mean to be callous, just practical.

  • I AM GUSSING LOCAL PESTICIDES OF MICOWAVE TRANSMITION

    NOT A DARK BIRD CONSPIRICY

  • @Ihatepoliticians2 ok. thanks.

  • @CMLaneLV So what do you suggest we do? I am open for suggestions and I am sure by the comments that a lot of other people are too.

  • @makedonijaljubovmoja I totally agree!

  • @cherubicnerd I'm not sure, but I think the limit on children in China is one per couple. That's why so many girls are either aborted or adopted by other countries. They want a boy to carry on the family name.

  • no government should be able to tell people how many children they should have. look at china. two children per household and girl babies are not of value. that's why you see so many chinese baby girls being adopted by americans. some of you think it's alright but wait until it happens in america. i guess then you'll see how wrong it is.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more