Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bomb Damage or Rent Control?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,196
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 30, 2006

Economists have often said that the most efficient way of destroying a city besides bombing is to impose rent control. Here's the evidence.

You need to turn up your volume, YouTube messed it up.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • A "victim of rent deregulation"?? Do you even know how pathetic that sounds? This is the USA, not Cuba

  • PROP 98 in California would be devastating for all renters, especially those in mobile home communities.

    PLEASE VOTE NO ON 98

    HATE 98

    YES ON 99

    99 IS FINE

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So rent control will make my home explode? I don't get this? Can I counter with a slide show of kittens to prove that rent control increases fluffyness?

  • @IrishAmericanPride You confuse the current housing crisis where the "government" forced lenders to lend money to unqualified buyers(blacks and latinos). Shock of shocks when they couldn't pay their mortgage. Secondly, you don't understand how housing gets built. If the government say put drastic controls on housing, investors would walk away and invest in Chinese factories instead. Housing would skyrocket as there would be no new housing.

  • what the hell are you talking about housing developments? I'm talking about empty apartments and homes. There's a ton of 'em where I live because people can't afford to pay these disgusting, outlandish amounts of money to live in them. The real estate market needs to be regulated a lot more than what it is. Real estate agents are gouging the working class, who can barely afford to pay rent, let alone utilities.

  • well that is because there is no housing development elsewhere because of rent control, which means supply is restricted, which means higher prices. demand is simply greater than supply. the government also restricts these markets with "open land" laws and silly environmental legislation. your situation would be much better off if the govt didnt mess around with these things

  • right, but I shouldn't have to pay 2 grand a month to live in that apartment.

  • wow. you need to do some reading. rent control means no investment in urban housing and hence, no housing. i think having an apartment at all is better than none at all

  • What about all of the people you don't know that work 2 and three jobs but aren't able to buy a home at all because there are none?

  • No economic analysis, just watching more and more people I know working 2 and 3 jobs, yet still having trouble buying a house and/or struggling to make rent.

  • What economic analysis brought you to that fantastic conclusion.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more