@DefeatedElitist And just how poor of a candidate are you willing to vote for? The lesser of two evils approach only ensures that the system will never truly change. Sitting out an election because both candidates suck doesn't itself effect change, however I don't see how taking an active role in electing one of said candidates is a preferable option. And to hold that Mccain's administration would be radically different from Obama's is tenuous position at best.
His poppa was a CIA operative hoaxing as a "conservative" although Wm F Buckley's real task was to further the false 'right vs left' paradigm to keep the nation divided while the satanists in the CIA-MilitaryIndustry wrecked havoc across the globe with endless wars and death. So Chris Buckley's endorsement of Barry Soetoro--a handpicked puppet for the globalists--is a moot discussion. To see the sad state of Wm F Buckley's last days search YouTube for "Death William F Buckley" on Charlie Rose.
@tabber87 And how exactly does sitting out an election do any good? I do not agree with Obama, but to not vote for him would have made him one vote weaker against his opposition. He was, and still is, the lesser of two wrongs. I desperately wish there was an alternative, but unfortunately there is not, which is why Obama will be getting my vote in the upcoming election. There is absolutely no healthy/sane alternative.
@ReDiserio I sincerely hope you decide to pursue enough of an education to think on your own. Whether you agree or disagree with Obama, calling him a Communist, or a Socialist, is proof of inferior intellectual stature. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion; just be aware that it makes you look like a fool.
Chris how is that vote working out for you? Or for US? good call so glad ur Dad didnt see this, both are terrible....NO the decent thing to do would be to NOT HAVE HANDED OUR COUNTRY over the the Communist
"The Obamacons — that’s to say, conservatives hot for Barack- – justify their decision to support a big-spending big-government Democrat with the most liberal voting record in the Senate by “hoping” that he doesn’t mean it, by “hoping” that he’ll “change” in office...
The “change” we’ll get isn’t hard to discern: An expansion of government, an increase in taxes, a greater annexation of the dynamic part of the economy by the sclerotic bureaucracy, a reduction in economic liberty.." --Mark Steyn
@DefeatedElitist And just how poor of a candidate are you willing to vote for? The lesser of two evils approach only ensures that the system will never truly change. Sitting out an election because both candidates suck doesn't itself effect change, however I don't see how taking an active role in electing one of said candidates is a preferable option. And to hold that Mccain's administration would be radically different from Obama's is tenuous position at best.
tabber87 2 weeks ago
His poppa was a CIA operative hoaxing as a "conservative" although Wm F Buckley's real task was to further the false 'right vs left' paradigm to keep the nation divided while the satanists in the CIA-MilitaryIndustry wrecked havoc across the globe with endless wars and death. So Chris Buckley's endorsement of Barry Soetoro--a handpicked puppet for the globalists--is a moot discussion. To see the sad state of Wm F Buckley's last days search YouTube for "Death William F Buckley" on Charlie Rose.
goohgulliscia 2 weeks ago
@tabber87 And how exactly does sitting out an election do any good? I do not agree with Obama, but to not vote for him would have made him one vote weaker against his opposition. He was, and still is, the lesser of two wrongs. I desperately wish there was an alternative, but unfortunately there is not, which is why Obama will be getting my vote in the upcoming election. There is absolutely no healthy/sane alternative.
DefeatedElitist 2 weeks ago
@ReDiserio I sincerely hope you decide to pursue enough of an education to think on your own. Whether you agree or disagree with Obama, calling him a Communist, or a Socialist, is proof of inferior intellectual stature. You are, of course, entitled to your opinion; just be aware that it makes you look like a fool.
DefeatedElitist 2 weeks ago
Chris how is that vote working out for you? Or for US? good call so glad ur Dad didnt see this, both are terrible....NO the decent thing to do would be to NOT HAVE HANDED OUR COUNTRY over the the Communist
ReDiserio 3 weeks ago
The man is a moderate conservative and the National Review kicked him out! That is a moderate conservative publication. Wild times.
macco360 1 month ago
"The Obamacons — that’s to say, conservatives hot for Barack- – justify their decision to support a big-spending big-government Democrat with the most liberal voting record in the Senate by “hoping” that he doesn’t mean it, by “hoping” that he’ll “change” in office...
The “change” we’ll get isn’t hard to discern: An expansion of government, an increase in taxes, a greater annexation of the dynamic part of the economy by the sclerotic bureaucracy, a reduction in economic liberty.." --Mark Steyn
hookalakah 1 year ago
His arguments on the Daily Beast were right on. Look at what Palin is up to today! What on earth would she have been like as a VP?
cochranexyz 1 year ago
@aussieguy2109 No one in their right mind could have voted for Obama/Biden.
That's why I sat my first presidential election out.
tabber87 1 year ago
@napoleonseven probably the same, despite obama's preformance, he was the only sane option.
aussieguy2109 1 year ago