Dinosaurs and the Bible - Steve Wolfe
Top Comments
All Comments (908)
-
@BlackKlitschkofan It's quite revealing that you, rather than refute what I've posted, go straight to calling me arrogant, threatening me with destruction and accuse me of having a "wicked heart" (it pumps blood, what's so wicked about that?). I guess when you have no argument ad hominem attacks are all that is left.
-
@Jazza66 continue to mock at God you folly heart,your unrepented end, your arrogance and evil pride will be the biggest scare OF YOUR LIFE AND EXISTENCE and your final destruction. Instead shutting your mouth, you use it to cause more damage to your poor soul, I feel sorry for many of your kind. You take the grace of Gods thats keeping your poor soul alive for granted giving you the chance to repent, but the wickedness of your heart, is going to be your downfall, Jesus is Lord!!
-
Science takes study, mental effort and long, hard work to understand. Religion takes zero mental effort. Turn your brain off and believe what you are told.
-
@hugoboss0011 Creation tends to lead to infintie regression "who created the created" If there was an initial cause what would it have interest in human affairs. How does creation lead to the ontological concept of a deity as prescribed by religion?
The origins of existence are a in deed a great mystery, we can only study matter with certainty as for a reason or purpose? well...that will always be influence by subjectivness.
heres a question for you does cause require conciousness?
-
@bavz1234 No. not religion vs. Science. God created science. You know if people would just pick up the Holy Scriptures and read, you would look at the stuff we learn differently. Thats if you study it just like our Science books or Biology books ect.. I was the same just like everybody who only believed what he or she sees physically. I thought the Bible was just a book of rules. Ohhh man I was wrong. I stood away from it because I was Atheist.
-
In the book of JOB in the old testament it describes a creature that has a Brontosauras feature. And also a creature that resembles a dragon.
-
@theELUSIV I agree. I like how science xplains how things are put together and work. But wait .... in order for something to work perfectly (in a sense) don't you need a creator to make it work?
-
@1927Norma Thank you. I completely agree. How could we even come to think that bones are millions of years old? All guesses and theories. Evolution stinks all the way if you ask me,
-
@1927Norma there's a simple answer, there has NEVER been any tissue (in the sense you most likely mean it) found on a fossil. Nor have there been any red blood cells. Nor has there been bone tissue in any fossils found. What this man is saying are lies. Pure lies, simple as that. If you do a bit of google research you'll find the original papers these creationtards are misquoting. And no, I am not being offending, I'm being honest. Please, do the research yourself and find out for yourself.
-
it's 2012...this is from 2006...and intellectual midgets still insist on kicking and screaming that dinosaurs lived together with man. It is just scary...very very scary.
@777lamppost It sure does describe the Earth as "circular", which fits with the Mesopotamian view that the Earth was a flat disc shape prior to the time that particular verse of the bible was written. Makes you wonder why the nomadic tribes who wrote the bible didn't just say "spherical", or "ball-shaped" or even "shaped like an ostrich egg" when they purportedly had knowledge from God so as avoid all this debate down the line! Maybe their God didn't know the Earth is spherical?
Jazza66 10 months ago 9
not circular reasoning for age of rocks. Radiometric dating is initially used to determine the age of a rock. Once that is found we can use common sense to find the age of fossils using other fossils. In certain time periods (layers of rock) a general trend is found that specific life form is found. So if we find a living organism in the same layer of rock as the one with a known age, it is reasonable to say that these two fossils are the same age - dating fossils with fossils.
randomhobbyist 11 months ago 3