Tour de France Lance's Duel with Ullrich in Hell on Wheels
Top Comments
All Comments (75)
-
@bikerdude5580 douchey!!
-
@Gre3njaw Yeah, because he used his cancer to take forbidden substances for free.
-
cool video ULLE all the way!
-
Armstrong, was able to get his Tour wins because of people like Dr. Ferrari. His V02 max of 82 is really low for a Grand Tour contender, goes to show how juiced up he has to get. Consider that Contador's is 88, Basso's is 87 & Ullrich's was 85.
-
@bikerdude5580 True, but Armstrong would have owned Mercks, Hinault, Copi, all of them, anytime.
-
@bikerdude5580 Eddy Merckx=greatest cyclist of all time
-
I meant to give a thumbs up... sorry about that
-
you can see the spark of ullrich's deraiileur on the road when he fell
-
Even though EPO use gives an improvement of 20%. 20% doesn't sound like a lot but multiplied over the length of the tour... 3500km = 700km LA beat them all. What a guy!
-
Some reports suggest that testicular cancer at a young age is linked to hormone abuse. Although I'm not suggesting that the great American, who defeated testicular cancer, would do such a thing. It speaks volumes of LA that he continually beat his peers, even when a lot of them were utilising artificial performance enhancers... David Millar, Tyler Hamilton, Danilo Di Luca, Marco Pantani, Folyd Landis, Gilberto Simoni, Ivan Basso, Alexander Vinokourov, Jan Ullrich...
Do you people even know of Eddy Merckx or Bernard Hinault at all? Lance was good don't get me wrong but he wasn't the best... he didn't win 525 races or 11 grand tours like Merckx and a slew of other races. So please study up before you make statements like that
bikerdude5580 4 years ago 12
what is the best car? who is the best painter? who is the best driver? who is the best cyclist?
nobody can tell. of course you american guys can identify yourself with him, an that's okay. but i think in the whole history, eddy merckx was the most influental character....
tobotron 4 years ago 4