Pro-Troop Advocates Tell Supervisors NOT to Undermine Troops

On Tuesday, January 8, 2007, Move America Forward sent a delegation to the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to stop them from passing a resolution that would have undermined our troops serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• MoveAmericaForward
• Iraq
• Sacramento
• Supervisors
• Troops
• Military
• Heroes
• War
• Terrorism

[GOEBubbaShuv]

Yet another fine example of Americans Standing Up against the anti-patriots. It's amazing how much can be done by a few true patriots.

Bravo! MoveAmericaForward!

Supervisor Roger Dickinson - kiss my ass.

[jefeisdguard]

We need more POSITIVE responses! Thank you, soldiers! Thank you, very much! It would've been a SAD SAD day if this did NOT PASS. There are just TOO MANY ANTI-WAR PEOPLE who's efforts NOT ONLY HARM THE TROOPS BUT MAY, IN FACT, BE CERTAINLY EMOTIONALLY FATAL IF NOT, FATAL.

[wittlesbach]

As a society, we need to do everything that we can to support our troops. Where would America be without the brave men and women in our armed forces willing to go into harm's way? They deserve our thanks, our support, and our respect. We should all do as much as we can for them. We should also support their missions. It isn't enough to just say, "I support the troops." We must also support their fight for victory!

[slizzler1]

Every simpleton neocon wants to blame the CIA, but CIA reports always maintained SPECULATIONS about WMDs in Iraq- they never ever said Saddam had WMDs set to go and as an imminent threat to the USA. CIA is not to blame- the neocon pissants in the admin deliberately manipulated the reports to make it seem there was an imminent threat -that's the difference between Bush and Clinton.Warmongering neocons started a destructive war based on their manufactured lies,and thus helped rebuild Al quaeda.

[slizzler1]

Listen -they interviewed Saddam after he was captured and he gave the whole truth. He said he speculated with the idea of a new WMD program after Gulf War BUT it never went further than that. How did Clinton KNOW there were WMDs in Iraq!!! There were none there. The CIA never had ANY conclusive proof WMDs were there BECAUSE there were no WMDs there- There was never an IMMINENT threat to the USA like Bush and the neocons lyingly announced. That Syria link has be proven to be rubbish by the way.

[mitersawz]

Apparently you're unaware that Hill/Billy said that Saddam had WMD's and that America may need to take him out of power. I'm no fan of W,but he had no choice. The reason he didn't have the best intel was due to the CIA being gutted by dems for years. Every intel agency in the world believed he had WMD's. His generals said that he had them (after the war as well)and that they were moved to/through Syria. Why else would Saddam have fought to the death?Check into it and you'll see that I'm correct.

[slizzler1]

What does Iraq have to do with 9-11? The Iraq war was started based on a neocon lie- inflating shady cia reports.... you thick headed war supporters are getting our troops killed and injured for a lie.

[johnbenko]

my move america forward video is much much better..

[Camilo19832001]

thank you... we need all the support we can get, especially since code pink is out there and calling us terrorist.

[JCUSAF23]

Thanks MAF for your support.

[woolybeth]

Way to go MAF another one bites the dust! See you sometime.