Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Meade ETX-70 image gallery - # 1 - galaxies

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
32,421
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 26, 2009

The third of my Youtube trilogy of deepsky imaging from suburbia via a small Meade ETX-70 telescope + CCD camera - little or nothing visible through the same telescope aimed at these faint objects.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (nytecam)

  • :-D i have just realized the size of your telescope and that I'm notgoing to get these sorts of images....... but what intresting things can i expect too see with a etx80? will there be any chance of seeing a whirlpool cluster of stars?

  • @MrBroomdogg You will see the Whirlpool galaxy as a faint fuzzy patch of light - a really big scope needed to see it clearly - I've used a special astro cam to get these ETX-70 shots but good luck in your stargazing;-)

  • what kind of things can you see with a meade etx-80 at-tc? theres one for like $250 and im thinking about buying one, and i want to know if i can see plantes, nebulas, ect.

  • @appleipodtouch2g This range of scopes are all portable and intended for general day/night viewing but views of the planets will be poor due to short focal length of ~350mm - if ok for my w/angle deepsky imaging. If serious about visual astro I'd go for a 6" or larger Dobsonian scope.

  • you seem like a person who knows what may be a good telescope, my friend is willing to give me a small electronic 7 or so-inch reflector telescope with a 4 inch focal length or something like that, for a fraction of the price it was bought, what sort of pictures do you think i would be able to take with it on things like the moon and the orion constellation among other "beginner" regions?

  • @ConnorXV Connor - I presume you mean 7" x 40" focal length?? The moon and brightest planets can be snapped with a 'static' telescope but the stars need a good driven scope that tracks the stars accurately. So if its cheap [and without a full spec] then give it a go otherwise avoid.

see all

All Comments (51)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • cool video realy intresting images. im thinking of starting astronomy/star gazing...... could i get the same images and detail with the etx80 backpack setup? cheers.

  • Great hobby,Great uppload..thanx for sharing and all the best!

  • wow i want that scope....

  • wow !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @nytecam i dont know all the things about measurements, just the approximate width of the mirror 6-7", i dont know the distance between the mirror and the secondary refloctor thing but it isnt massive (if it has any relevance at all), he wouldnt give me a piece of crap i know that but i was just wandering whether its worth it or not, seeing as i have a newtonian telescope with a 6" reflector myself (still learning how to use it).

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more