Professor Noam Chomsky |interviewed with| Cindy Sheehan
Top Comments
All Comments (55)
-
Haha! You're like a child who believes in Santa, even after being told by their parents it's not true.
-
GUJ,
Quite the reverse. The burden of proof is on those who carry water for the widely-accepted government conspiracy theory or "investigation" that John Farmer and 6 of the 10 commissioners understand was, let's say, problematic. I could show you evidence of gov't contradictions and malfeasance regarding 9/11 but, the cozy Al Qaeda perpetual-crisis-bubble you're living in will no doubt prohibit you from listening. Enjoy that Patriot Act. I wish you and your principles all the best.
-
I don't explain myself to 9/11 truthers out of principle, it would pretend that it was me who needed the evidence and not yourself, and you can't logically disprove a negative. It would be like me trying to show you why a hamster doesn't control the world.
-
"what are your 9/11 non-inside job reasons?"
Watch Chomsky on 9/11 conspiracy, he gives every reason for you to come back to reality.
-
Cindy Sheehan said that Israel killed her son and not the crazy Muslim maniac who blew him up...
... Whether you supported the war or not, if you don't blame the killer, then you might as well forgive every murderer who ever lived and put the blame on everyone else. It's like saying the deaths in Gaza aren't the fault of Israeli's who commited them, but I have a feeling Cindy Sheehan wouldn't avoid that kind of contradiction.
-
He needs to know more than "a thing or two" to trump a climatologist or any other natural scientist. So what is your point?
-
As one of the world's most renowned scientists he doesn't need to be a climatologist to know a thing or two about the difference between science and pseudoscience.
There is more to it than that. The US has committed far worse crimes. Why concentrate on this one, which has inadequate academic support, as opposed to the others where the documented record is massive?
There are also many reasons to believe it wasn't an inside job. A pretext for Middle Eastern intervention would not have been hard to ascertain. Why risk dissolving the Republican party and being lined up in front of a firing squad? It's a sort of inane proposition.
mdoob11 2 years ago 6
why does the goddamn volume go down at the end of Chomsky's replies?
MrCoreyCole 9 months ago 2