Shroud of Turin (part 1)

again the scriptures are always right about these heathen always seeking after signs

Ha Ha! The PC BBC. It IS the Shroud of Jesus because it's DNA and Blood Type (AB) match the Sudarium.-which is the Face Cloth which was wrapped around Christ's head befire being removed from the cross. It is kept in Valencia Cathedral and has a documented history of 2000 years

The Eucharistic Miracle of Lanciano ALSO has blood type AB. -as do ALL known Eucharistic Miracles.
Watch the Documentaries. Linen experts have studied it a pathology report describes horrific facial wounds It is Jesus!

Fucking retards with nothing better to do. Go read a history book, find out what life was like 500 years ago. Religion and God are truly wicked and need to be shed off. I would like to take a good shit on the turin fake, beat the pope to a pulp, cripple the dali lama, burn all priests, rabbis and mullahs, eradicate FOREVER this nonsence. Poor feabile minded sheep, yearning to believe in some bullshit. GROW UP

Another blow to the Shroud worshippers out today from the BBC. Archeologists dug up a man wrapped in a shroud from the time that Jesus is alleged to have lived and found the weave far different than the complex weave of the Shroud of Turin. It suggests the Shroud is exactly what scientist claim: A l forgery from around the 12th century

I was just reading that article, very interesting indeed. I wonder though, just how many of the faithful will read it, or just choose to ignore it as propaganda.

Interestingly, if you look above his eyes, to the left (i. e. blood marks) you may see, as I do; number 17 ... now look right until you see the number 3 ... OK? ... Now look in the New Testament: John 17.3 ... This may, of course, all be just coincidence ... But is it?

you need to read the bible again, it said that jesus' face was worse than any man who ever lived, as i said, beyond recognition. i believe in jesus, i have a personal relationship. but the face in the shroud is nowhere nearly as devestated as described in the bible. if it was, and if the beard was missing, then i would believe it might be him too. the facts of the shroud and te descriptions in the bible do not match.

why are you stuck on jesus' beard HAVING to have been pulled out? because you think Isaiah makes it so?

if thats your opinion, then fine.
I DON'T CARE.

i don't think isaiah 50 is talking about jesus, i KNOW it is, if you care to study 50 to about 55 you should see it is jesus too. i am only trying to help with the truth, so don't care if thats' what you want. it don't make me stray from the truth.

can you take yourself any more seriously?

you have your opinions, and I have mine.

cheers.