Sorry, but being a dick for the sake of it would be pointing out this: The Harrier II was never a Hawker design, it was designed by McDonnel Douglas/Boeing.
@davylah think everyone knows that, but it was origionaly a hawker aircraft so whenever someone searches for it on youtube or google etc that is what they will search for, as unless you are a geek like most of us they are not going to type BAE HarrierII GR7 are they! DOnt be a dick just for the sake of it
The camera perspective is deceptive. The Harrier is displaying at the required safety distance. It isn't the first time that the nozzle mix up has caused an accident.
@colbertnation1776
Luftwaffe didn't agree on that :-)
But that's all water under the bridge, don't mention the war and things...
Bietel 1 year ago
@craneydude
"How do I tell me mom?" I guess...
Bietel 1 year ago
Well, VTOL, 'vertical take off and landing'... right, right...
That landing was as good as vertical, now wasn't it?
Bietel 1 year ago
why is there no sound?!
glenw89 1 year ago
Haha
davylah 1 year ago
Sorry, but being a dick for the sake of it would be pointing out this: The Harrier II was never a Hawker design, it was designed by McDonnel Douglas/Boeing.
davylah 1 year ago
@davylah think everyone knows that, but it was origionaly a hawker aircraft so whenever someone searches for it on youtube or google etc that is what they will search for, as unless you are a geek like most of us they are not going to type BAE HarrierII GR7 are they! DOnt be a dick just for the sake of it
cphaza 1 year ago
Don't mean to be pedantic, but it's not a 'Hawker' Harrier, it's a BAE Harrier II GR7
davylah 1 year ago
Pilot flying beyond his capabilities. Wasting money on a stunt he couldn't perform. Prick
eezy1972 2 years ago
Fitnessfreaky,
The camera perspective is deceptive. The Harrier is displaying at the required safety distance. It isn't the first time that the nozzle mix up has caused an accident.
TE3EJ 2 years ago