Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

9/11 Truth In 9 Minutes

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
8,659
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 10, 2009

Comparison videos of known high-rise steel structure fires of the Parque Central Tower Fire, Mandarin Hotel Fire, Windsor Tower Fire with the fires in the World Trade Center North Tower, South Tower and Building Seven. Videos of highlighted known controlled demolitions. Both top down and conventional demolitions.

Video uploaded for nonprofit, educational purposes only under the "fair use" provision of U.S. Code, Title 17, section 107.
http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • You know we live in sad times when we need to make videos demonstrating the fact that buildings don't collapse on themselves spontaneously for no reason.

    I think I should make a video, demonstrating how electricity is "food" for electrical appliances, I'm sure this will shock many and be controversial.

  • Thanks for posting that ... good comparsions of the buildings that burned far longer and were more intense than the fires at the WTC ... good job ...keep up the great work.

see all

All Comments (52)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Excellent video.

    It would be easier to believe that building fires could cause steel high rise building collapses if the buildings that collapsed were the ones totally engulfed in flames.

    But how can anyone believe that the three WTC towers disintegrated into clouds of dust in mere seconds as the result of comparatively low temperature, smokey fires in isolated regions of the buildings?

    Some sheeple will believe anything, as long as Big Brother stamps it the "official" truth.

  • Suggesting that passenger planes hit either WTC 1 or @ presumes facts not in evidence.

  • /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA

    /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k

    /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI

    /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU

    /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4

    /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY

    /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE

    /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w

    /watch?v=hVaGht6eHoQ

    /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

  • 4dislikes, four ignorant idiots.

  • This guy sounds like Herbert the Pervert from Family Guy

  • A glowing example of falsehoods, half truths and strawman claims.

  • im guessing that blowing up a building so expertly is something that requires a lof of experiance. some where mistakes are not premitted. something required of say an expert in the matter? how many experts are there? is all demolition the same? say blowing up a tin can the same as blowing up a building so perfectly?

  • im guessing that blowing up a building so expertly is something that requires a lof of experiance. some where mistakes are not premitted. something required of say an expert in the matter?

  • The top down demo put the nail in the coffin for me (not that it wan't already in). Almost identical to the way the towers blew up. This is the first time I've seen a top dpwn demo. Excellent vid!

  • @TheTruthRising wasn't the original hole only 16 feet across (before the roof caved in)?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more