Intel Next Generation Atom Platform
Top Comments
All Comments (109)
-
About those small cases of desktops, try to make something like a iMac, takes even less space than creating a small desktop that is even less than a half of that presented, making PC in or with monitor is better idea than creating another Desktop, but...if you want to walk around and connect your own data or something, then yes, smaller than half size of presented is great idea too.
-
I'm very sad that the Intel Atom processor exists, or the "netbooks" they run within. If there's one thing the Atom processor can't handle, it's loading and processing new information. This has to be one of the weakest, most incompetent processors for online browsing. I have wasted more time on my Samsung Series 5 Chromebook than was worth it.
It would be far less misleading to use "netbooks" only for Windows, local applications, as it is less demanding than interacting with the Internet.
-
Wow! You mean I can't actually DO anything with an Atom processor except look at it and a booted screen desktop? Yippee!!!! Intel Atom FFOORREEVVEERR.
Puny processor!
-
Every time I watch this, I chuckle. Look at the pretty colours of the computers that don't actually do anything except be SLOWWWW!!!
-
In other words, since Intel Atom is slow, avoid it unless you're truly desperate for a computer. The Atom is puny. It is weak and can't handle HTML5 well enough to competently run Fieldrunners, for example. The GPU can't handle BioDigital Human, for another example.
But most remarkably, Intel is all talk in this video. Or do you think it's a mistake that she doesn't DO anything with the computers and chips other than talk?
SSLLOOWW. Cheap.
I'd call it crap but the AMD E-359 is actually WORSE!
-
I noticed the host didn't actually show the Intel Atom processor in action ~ just still images on small computers.
Let me tell you that my Samsung Series 5 Chromebook with the latest Atom N570 1.66GHz dual-core is SLOW! I have to wait almost 20 seconds for Google Docs to load!
SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW SLOW
Intel should be ashamed to display the Atom as anything better than last-resort chips for the poor.
-
will this run crysis 2 on ultra?
-
@JackSparrowO Fact,an intel quad core outperforms a similar generation amd's quad core.It might cost more but your paying for the PERFORMANCE and LESSER POWER CONSUMPTION,in the end your getting your work done faster AND paying less for your electric bills.If you don't understand how to calculate it yourself then its not my problem.
-
@TheStuffyBear :Look Asshole I dont have time for your shit. You knows AMD never tries to copy any thing from fucking Intel. AMD processors of same range and generation always excel Intel anytime at half the cash. AMD's arch is way better than Intels. If you dont understand how Not my problem.
All of this is true, but this new architecture will most likely choke on 1080p movies.
TheWMhater 2 years ago 6
@JackSparrowO Your fucking dumb.Intel have better processor then amd which is a fact,amd had been using a pentium 3 architecture until now which they finally hire some smart enginers to developed their own "bulldozer" architecture.
Besides intel's processor use less power then any amd's cheap ass processor.Sure argue for your fucking "price to performance ratio" but the fact is intel will save you money in a long run.
TheStuffyBear 4 months ago 4