Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Obama vetoes bill to speed foreclosures

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
392 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 7, 2010

Privacy Policy: http://www.cnn.com/privacy.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Obama won't sign a bill that could have made it easier for courts to clear foreclosures, the White House said Thursday.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs called the president's action a "pocket veto," although there was some dispute over whether Obama can use that method of disapproving legislation.

A pocket veto is a veto that happens with Congress is out of session, but the Senate isn't quite out of session under a bipartisan deal worked out to prevent the president from making recess appointments.

The move is not the president's first veto. He also vetoed a spending bill at the end of 2009.

The bill would have required federal and state courts to recognize documents that were notarized in other states. Both congressional chambers approved the legislation by voice votes, a move used for noncontroversial bills. The House passed it in April, and the Senate passed it Sept. 27.

However, housing advocates and attorneys warned that the bill might have made it more difficult to challenge the quality of foreclosure records at a time when reports of improperly foreclosed homes are increasing.

"We have heard from officials around the country about the concern that they have about the possible unintended consequences of this legislation -- certainly in light of what we are seeing in the mortgage processing," said Gibbs at his daily briefing.

"So out of an abundance of caution and to ensure that those unintended effects don't harm consumers the president will send the bill back and believes that Congress did not intend for those unintended consequences to be in the legislation," Gibbs added.

Pressure has been building on U.S. banks to halt more foreclosures amid widespread allegations that loan servicers failed to verify legal documents in what could be hundreds of thousands of cases.

Lawmakers have asked the Justice Department, the Federal Reserve, and the Comptroller of the Currency to investigate bank foreclosure processes and the Texas Attorney General halted foreclosures processed by 30 loan servicers in that state.

Ally Financial, JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) all announced plans last week to freeze foreclosures in the 23 U.S. states where they must be approved by the courts.

Foreclosures continue in the remaining 27 states, including California and Texas, where they are not subject to judicial review. Two other major financial institutions, Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) and Citigroup (C, Fortune 500), have yet to halt any foreclosures.

The bill aimed to clear up congestion in the courts by forcing courts to recognize notaries from other states, even if the records included electronic signatures.

Republicans immediately pushed back on the move, saying there was "absolutely no connection whatsoever" between the bill and recent foreclosure documentation problems, said Rep. Robert Aderholt, R-Ala., who sponsored the bill in the House.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid released a statement calling for his home state of Nevada, where he is in a tough re-election fight, to halt foreclosures. But he did not mention the pocket veto.

One Democratic lawmaker, Rep. John Conyers, Jr., of Michigan, applauded the president's move, despite a lack of concern about the bill when the House passed the measure in April.

"Although I believe the bill was originally well intentioned, I now believe this issue requires more careful review and discussion before the law is changed," Conyers said in a statement.

The president's move sends the legislation back to Congress "to fix this," Gibbs said.

However, there's some question as to whether the move was an official "pocket veto," since the Senate is still in session. But Gibbs said that he was told by White House attorneys that "the president certainly has the constitutional power to do that, and that is what he's exercising."

Official Link: http://money.cnn.com/2010/10/07/news/economy/pocket_veto/index.htm?hpt=T1

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • How do you see when your representatives are cornered in Washington? A lot of frauds and capitol corruptions hiding behind doors when there is no investigative journalism. People, we should go on line and learn how to do investigative journalism, collecting and verifying information so we can push a trend for real transparency.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more