83 - Is Energy Not Conserved?

Wow! Over 5.5 million views for my channel! Thanks everyone for your support. To read along go to http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2011/07/poll-83-is-energy-not-...
Other links from this entry:
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2010/02/22/energy-is-not-con...
http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2010/02/im-you-from-future.html
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2011/06/21/back-through-the-...
http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/12/how-to-time-travel.html
http://imaginingthetenthdimension.blogspot.com/2009/10/temporal-mass.html

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Poll
• 83
• Is
• Energy
• Not
• Conserved
• space
• time
• spacetime
• Sean
• Carroll
• relativity
• Einstein
• expanding
• universe
• physics
• philosophy
• tenth
• dimension
• tenthdimension
• Bryanton

[mirandansa]

What's your view on the recent news that CERN scientists claim to have discovered particles faster than light, which would undermine Einstein's theory of special relativity?

[10thdim]

@mirandansa Go to my channel comments for my take on this. Thanks!

[frageee]

make video about neutrino!

[tunateun]

YES! a new 10thdim video!!

[valsotto27]

@10thdim where is that?

[thewindtheend]

make a video weakly

[digitalink2001]

@RuinSonic The problem which he's getting at is the closed system... If we move across dimensions.. (ie a 5th dimensional probability space caused naturally as our 4th dimensional timeline propagates) does this new space contain the same energy as the 4th dimensional line which carried us to that point? Or is this energy somehow transferred into other timeless unevenly? Think of a branch where energy is distributed. Its conserved as a sum, however each "universe" has a different total.

[digitalink2001]

@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?

[digitalink2001]

@sonnydey I agree ... If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?

[digitalink2001]

@sonnydey I agree with someday.. If we observe the expansion according to how you see the 10 dimensions each 3rd dimensional slice is the boundary which contains our energy. If we move along that 4th dimensional line should not each frame contain a consistent amount of energy? Furthermore, if it does not then at the point at which an event occurs there must presumably be some transfer of energy across 4th dimensional timelines. Does this mean energy, like gravity, effects multiple dimensions?

[digitalink2001]

Question... How does the expansion of our universe result in an increase of energy? Based on the Law of Conservational energy one would come to the conclusion that the volume is simply increase resulting a "less dense" universe. However what this idea proposes is that dark energy is somehow converted into our universe and imbalances its naturual state. The question then becomes... by what means is this conversion possible?

[MaximusDisplay]

Thanks for the link to your vid, Flow... very relevant to the stage in life I'm going through

[sonnydey]

I would say that in our 3D world it only looks like energy is NOT conserved when it comes to general relativity, that's because space-time is not only in 3D but time is 4D.

So you would have to look at that problem in 4D way and I bet you would find that energy is conserved in 4D.

If in our 3D world with general relativity energy seems to be lost, it's because in 4D it's gained by the same amount.