Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Rep. Issa- Didn't Object to Bush Czars

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
13,965
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 16, 2009

9/16/09

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • President Obama is a humanist as 95% of people in the country are. Only a small minority of religious fanatics believe that God and not people should be the primary focus of people's attention. He is not a Marxist and he is not leading the country into socialism. When the socialism revolution comes, it will be led by a socialist party and it will destroy capitalist-worker relationships, not reinforce them by helping capitalists stay in business. Do a reality check, Murdoch-Newscorp robot.

  • Bush increased the number of positions nicknamed "czar" by 13. He did not only have 13. Besides it's a nickname started by the media several administrations ago. It basically means "really long job title". There's nothing evil about it.  LOOK IT UP SOMEWHERE OTHER THAN FOX!!!

see all

All Comments (70)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @JayPhilosopher they even got so pissed they didn't even correct them, i just counted, bush had 30 czars

  • Why are people talking about this? A czar is nothing evil in anyway shape or form. All fox noise does is use scary sounding words because they know their fan base is ignorant. If Fox viewers were intelligent and could think for themselves Fox would go off the air.

  • My favorite one with Bush was the one on women's health. I think he was a czar.... anyway he said women that have "female problems" should just stay home and pray about it. I liked Bush's "Faith-Base" czar too, I was never sure what he did, maybe pray for Bush.. I know I prayed a lot more while Bush was in office.

  • "so you admit that Czar appointments are unconstitutional"

    No. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that the President cannot have people who advise him/her. It does not say that (s)he cannot talk to anyone who is not elected.

    "You also admit that obama is no different than President Bush"

    Saying two people are similar and that they are exactly the same is completely different. For one thing, both Bush and Obama have two arms and two legs. This does not make them exactly the same.

  • theopolitical, so you admit that Czar appointments are unconstitutional. You also admit that obama is no different than President Bush. obama ran on "CHANGE", but you just proved that there is no "CHANGE". You're a liar too! 20 of the czars appointed by George W Bush were Senate confirmed, none were confirmed under your messiah. For example there were 5 "AIDS Czars" over Bush's eight years. Instead of counting the position once, the DNC is counting it FIVE times. DNC=Disinformation News Center

  • Bill Clinton (1993-2001)

    7 Czar positions, 10 Czar appointments

    Bush (2001-2009)

    31 Czar positions, 46 Czar appointments

    Barack Obama (2009-)

    32 Czar positions, 35 Czar appointments.

    Obama has only added 1 more "Czar" job. Bush added 24 more "Czar" jobs.

    Many of Obama's Czars were actually appointed by Bush (they were not fired when Obama was inaugurated).

    Also, "Czar" is slang for the job. The real position is an advisor

  • "Opposed to Obama's 47"

    Obama does not have 47 Czars. Even Glenn Beck isn't claiming Obama has more than 32 Czars.

    As a note, the reason there are more appointments than positions is because some people declined said appointment, or they retired/died at some point after accepting the appointment.

  • Where may I find a list of these positions?

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more