Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

precede to dyno vids pt 1 read sidebar

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
917 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 15, 2009

these two vids are to precede my dyno videos. Life is hectic with preparations for baby. I pulled away from working to shoot this quick segment of vids. These vids are shot with a digital camera in mpg format. My dyno vids are vob and need voice overs to put organization and descriptions to whats being shown. I am not good at that process so its been but on hold. A short run down has been said at end of vid 2........

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (higherpoweredh2o)

  • keep up the good work. i will be watching your future vids. HHO has a good teacher.

  • I am probably a horrible teacher. But I am doing my best. Thanks.

  • trying to upload part 2 now.........cross my fingers

  • Excellent and practical explanation on how physics can be viewed by the various types of measurements tools available. Not that it will end all the contraversories but you have shown the reason why there is so much controversory about HHO. That alone is a step forward.

    Good work !!!

  • I wish pt 2 would upload lol ill work on it later tonight till it accepts

    thanks rob

  • ( GASOLINE VAPOR COMBUSTION I... )

    SORRY Try this link.

    cheers.

  • there ya go. thats one of many techs I am working with. wrap up all the little stuff and make huge progress. vapor, hho, plasma, all known good techs. problem so far is overcomplication and lack of control in application.......

    Thats about to change,,,,,,,,saftley/

    May take a couple months off of youtube but will come back.

    Some political issues need a little more attention for now. I have given my direction and dont need to drag everyone along during the progress

see all

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • then say nothing

  • dude, you are being pretty vague.

  • This is why NASA tests with reformed hydrogen do not perfectly mirror results seen with hydroxy testing. Once you gain access to a gas spectrometer, you will be able to confirm this for yourself. It will be known that the claims I make have basis and credence. But because of the faster flame speed of hydroxy, the BTU argument is made less important. Because, as you pointed out - combustion speed equates to TORQUE, which results in increased efficiency.

  • I agree with you about ES. He is a good guy, and pretty smart. Despite the fact that he does not believe my references to hydroxy BTU's I respect his work. HOWEVER - hydroxy is NOT bottled hydrogen - (parahydrogen). Our cells make a percentage of orthohydrogen which contains more BTU's than para. This has been demonstrated with gas spectrometer testing (Bob Boyce). ES disagrees with this, but its already been demonstrated, and it is a known fact ortho has more BTU's than para.

  • Mega Joules per liter.

    Gasoline 34.2

    Gaseous Hydrogen at room temperature 0.01079

    HHO, two parts H one part O so divide 0.01079 by 3 x 2 = energy density 0.00719 Mega Joules per liter at room temp.

    Raise temp to typical HHO cell temp 185 F (60 amps input) gas expands 21.76 percent.

    0.00719 divided by 121.76 x 100 energy density now 0.00590 Mega Joules per liter.

    34.2 Mega Joules divided by 0.00590, ratio of 5,796.6 to one. One gallon of gasoline = 5,796.6 gallons of HHO.

  • whats the input amps and whats the output litres?

  • my cell runs at 6mmw what in that is impossible? I have not yet done any engine tests. So what have i claimed to do that is impossible?

    Or was this comment meant for some one ells?

  • Can you say moron? Right. If you would have paid attention in class, you would know what is possible with an engine and what is no. You would also know that there are laws of physics that cannot be broken , bent or rewritten. Not by me or by you. And yet you say you have done just that. There is a term for this and it is called "delusional"

  • You shoulda paid more attention in class is all I can say

  • i have improved from all the crap! and made something good for me. i started by getting RIPPED OFF! On buying a e-book! it only produce some very small bubbles. but they did pop. and i have been hooked sense! and a long way i have come.. so why not everyone ells? Smartscaircorow. Has only ever told me truth! everything he told me i tried and it was true! go to him on HHO, and come here for engines! Maybe you have a use to us yet! can you get Resonance? LOL..

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more