no impact

real planes explode on impact

http://www.911hoax.com/top_lists_911.asp

1. Planes are made of light materials like aluminum and fiberglass. Think of them as long beer cans. Even birds can give planes problems.

2. There were many steel core columns supporting both of the Twin Towers. No plane could enter such a structure without being completely destroyed.

3. Two planes were depicted as being inside and intact the Twin Towers, a pair of buildings made with 200,000 tons of steel each.

4. Eyewitnesses: Very few people in New York's business district actually had a decent view of the South Tower of the WTC. Only a few thousand people at most would have been able to see the South Tower explode. The author of this website has interviewed people who do not believe that they saw a plane strike the South Tower.

Meanwhile, it was a simple matter for the TV networks to keep the eyewitnesses who didn't see a plane off the air.

5. Both Boeing 767s (i.e., Flights 11 and 175, which supposedly struck the North and South Towers respectively) have 165 foot wingspans. Meanwhile, both the North and South Towers were 210 feet wide. We're supposed to believe that both planes were entirely inside the tower they hit, with no pieces showing, with only 45 feet of room to spare!

6. United Airlines Flight 175 was shown entering the South Tower like a ghost. When the tip of the plane's fuselage hits the steel exterior of the South Tower the fuselage should be breaking up. That would cause the wings to break off.

7. Newton's Third Law of Motion states that "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.". Let's apply Newton's Third Law to Flight 175. In the 9/11/01 story, Flight 175 strikes the the South Tower at 450 m.p.h.

Now imagine that the South Tower moved at 450 m.p.h. and struck a stationary Flight 175. We would not expect that Flight 175 would be undamaged. We would not expect that it would simply disappear into the South Tower.

8. There was no audio of 'Flight 175' striking the South Tower. This is true even though there were about a dozen videos of the event said to be obtained from lucky amateurs.

9. There are innumerable contradictions with the news reports of planes striking the WTC. (The author's writing is here.) Just a cursory examination of the 911 news reports can reveal dramatic inconsistencies.

10. There has been massive censorship of the 911 Hoax. Dozens of media sources have exercized a zero tolerance policy for any suggestion that no planes struck the WTC before it was vaporized from exotic weaponry and nuclear weapons.

Why would CBS, The New York Times, The History Channel, Indmedia.org and YouTube.com be censoring the idea so aggressively if real planes hit the Twin Towers?

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• ghost
• plane
• 911
• tv
• fake
• noplanes
• nico
• haupt
• 911taboo
• CGI
• krash
• physics
• for
• dummies
• world
• trade
• centre
• deception
• nwo
• iraq
• satanic
• elite
• evan
• fairbanks
• obamadeception
• 911composites
• wiki
• counterfeit
• news
• september
• eleventh
• attack
• staged
• by
• global
• as
• pretext
• to
• invade
• afghanistan

[thatswhattheyis]

Comparing a slow landing crash into an impenetrable surface (runway) cannot be held the same as a high speed crash into a forgiving building. I would assume that a plane traveling @ 600 mph would puncture a steel building pretty good. The only other plane to hit a building was a B-25 bomber in 1945 and it flew into the Empire State Bldg. It left a hole and ended up inside of it. The Empire State is sturdier than the WTC and a plane made it into it @1/2 of the speed of 9-11 jets.

[muckletoon]

@thatswhattheyis

The aeroplane would tear itself apart flying 600mph at sea level, another hallmark that the object seen in these videos representing a real boeing, is fake or has been manipulated.

[muckletoon]

@Jangochase

planehuggers are oblivious to the laws of physics

[lmfecher]

@thatswhattheyis

FACT: A 767 cannot fly 500mph at 800ft because of air density and structural integrity.

FACT: The tail section of the B-25 bomber that struck the Empire State Building was stuck in the outer wall of the building and could be seen from the street. It did NOT end up inside it.

FACT: WTC 1 & 2 were an engineering feat that could withstand hurricane force winds and MULTIPLE airliner hits.

FACT: NO commercial airliners were used as weapons on 9/11.

[koiter20]

@mariamole011 people thought that the first plane crash was an accident, so why would they think a second one was coming, and how would you even warn people inside the other building in time by the time they saw another plane coming. and planes dont explode on impact, it isnt the movies. A plane has hollow space on the inside, same as a building, thus it wont explode like it is hitting a completely solid object.

[koiter20]

except you forgot the people that saw the plane you fucking retards 

[panzlock]

That's right, everybody. That is not a 767-200ER. it is clearly some of gods sperm.

[MegaYeshua33]

@cartoonplanes Very interesting. What hard research have you done so far. Have spoken with any of the witness's, any air traffic controllers on the day?

[muckletoon]

@michiman57

The hologram meme is firm evidence you're a lousy troll, all the money shots of the plane hitting the WTC are faker than you.

[mariamole011]

@Dazeddirtydog i am not saying the video. but the passenger talking to their family aboult the airplane being hijacked. they phoned parents and family meber and sent texts. before the airplane hit the towers.

[Dazeddirtydog]

@mariamole011 Did you have a celphone that recorded video in 2001? I highly doubt it.

[nb45001]

@mariamole011 maybe the plane came so fast or it just took them by suprise?