Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

SciAm Interview with Mark Mathis of Expelled - 2 of 8

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,144
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 10, 2008

Scientific American interviewed Mark Mathis, associate producer of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed


The original audio can be downloaded here: http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=a-conversation-with-mark-mathis

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 241 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ahhhh, deBeuk, I've only just come across ur channel thanks to PiroNiros video exposing the alleged creationist Pope-Bot. So sad really : / Anyway, I'm replying to this particular post of yours as it seems some lovely person has seen fit to mark it as spam (which it clearly isn't). Good luck and keep it up!

  • at what point does trying to represent an issue that clearly has nuances and shades of gray,as black and white,go from clarifying an issue to misrepresenting it?these people are the height of dishonest scum.

  • people like ken miller would have confused the issue?then i guess religions like Catholicism and the Anglican church "confuse the issue" also.

  • Wow, its like they made him pick up his creationist bullshit and then smear the feces all over his own face. Oooh, he got his ass handed to him.

  • If there is any 'design' in the universe, then it must be at an incredibly fundamental level - i.e. a cellular automata having 'cells' of a size best described as being 'at the Planck scale'. To suggest that 'most people' would consider any 'design' (read evolved biological structures) the work of 'god' is pathetic. I wonder if he (Stein) knows that the US is the only economically relevant country on earth where the notion of a supernatural creator is not openly laughed at by the majority.

  • What a scumbag. When confronted with the true agenda of the ID camp he dismisses it as bias. Even Michael Moore will present the other side of the coin, albeit in a poor light typically, but he at least lets you know that there is an argument against the position, rather than go out of his way to snow you totally.

  • Interesting that after squirming his way out of every question prior, he just flat out admits the film may hurt the Discovery Institute's "ID is not creationism" agenda.

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more