A Challenge from cdk007: Put Up or Shut Up

Rate and Favorite this video after watching to prevent votebot attacks

This challenge was originally made by cdk007. The main video is his and I thank him for making it. Here is his profile:
http://www.youtube.com/user/cdk007

You claim to have the evidence. Well its time you put up. Science has over 240,000 peer-reviewed articles supporting evolution. Surely one of your arguments could pass. And don't posit conspiracy, claiming all scientists are god hating atheists as we all know science is a religiously diverse group.

Once Ive received an article that meets the qualifications set forth in the video I will link to it here:

To download this video copyright free please go to:
http://www.mediafire.com/?izmmfmtcgum

Why Answers Research Journal does not count as a valid peer-reviewed journal. In their own words they admit they are a biased publication, and therefore, they lack subjectivity and credibility. Here are their own words:

The following criteria will be used in judging papers: 1. Is the papers topic important to the development of the Creation and Flood model?... 3. Is this paper formulated within a young-earth, young-universe framework? 4. If the paper discusses claimed evidence for an old earth and/or universe, does this paper offer a very constructively positive criticism and provide a possible young-earth, young-universe alternative?... The editor-in-chief will not be afraid to reject a paper if it does not properly satisfy the above criteria or it conflicts with the best interests of AiG as judged by its biblical stand and goals outlined in its statement of faith.

And remember to always, Think about it.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• cdk007
• King
• Mike
• bubbamickmac
• Evolution
• science
• biology
• Intelligent
• Design
• Creation
• God
• Religion
• Faith
• Logic
• Reason
• Evidence
• Facts
• Observation
• Peer
• Review
• Publish
• Article
• Answers
• Genesis
• Museum
• discovery
• institute
• way
• of
• the
• master
• casey
• luskin
• stephen
• meyer
• ray
• comfort
• banana
• kirk
• cameron
• hovind
• cse
• Think
• About
• It

[TheBoopski]

LIKE I SAID...IF evolution was NOT TRUE and SOMEONE proved it false...IT WOULD BE WORLD NEWS ! And that person or persons would be THE MOST FAMOUS PERSON ALIVE TODAY ! THINK ABOUT IT...anyone who could prove the MAJORITY of scientist wrong...WOW that would be BIG NEWS ! Sorry it's a LONG SHOT and a PIPE DREAM ! WAKE UP...REALITY is with EVOLUTION !

[TheBoopski]

Sorry Lydia EVOLUTION is REAL and religion isn't.. Your bible is MYTH and FOLKLORE and is OUTDATED amongst all the other UGLIES there in ! People are tired of being decieved by that book , NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND !

[LoopQuantumGravity1]

"Dr" Hovind showed solid evidence of  blah,blah,blah.....

Apparently his knowledge of the tax code wasn't so impressive.

Anyway, CDK007 is correct - creationists keep moving the goal post. NO amount of evidence can persuade them because they believe they possess absolute truth. When you think you're the guardian of absolute truth, then you're stuck - you can't admit error. So when contradictory evidence is presented, you have to deny and lie, which is precisely what creationists do.

[strattfordcrass]

How can a scientist talk about intellectual honesty if they all accept the historical Jesus? In your case, how can you "define" science and it's greatness if you work with creationists scientists? It was so much better when faith and disbelief were a philosophical issue, without this ridiculous "debate" full of arrogant jerks offending each other...

[byteresistor]

@theshadow170y Actually he was a pantheist if anything.

[theshadow170y]

Einstein did not belive in the God of the Bible you retarded stupid monkey...he maybe belived in an Architect(search deism on google)

[vnorthru]

@PatRibsey

You're probably right, but CDK007 has provided the option of rejected papers which makes it worthless to claim this since if they cannot even provide a rejected paper shows they have not tried and therefore it is not a conspiracy.

[PatRibsey]

This is pointless - they'll just say that all scientists are Darwinist conspiracists who will ignore evidence presented by creationists!

[ChicaWolverina]

It's unlistenable. Your audio levels blast and then drop too low. Do this over!

[funincluded]

How do people that died hundreds of years ago have modern scientific beliefs?

Besides Einstein, all those guy's are fossils

[dildace]

What

[dildace]

lol