Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Out of Africa: just when did modern humans leave Africa and colonise the world?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
795 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 7, 2010

Peeved at seeing that ridiculous 40k to 60k date in the frickin media. Someone tell the ignorant twits to check first!

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Mathildaonline)

  • this video make no sense since DNA and archaeology has proven all modern humans came from africans. This Sub Saharrah nonsense is ridiculus, cuz the saharah wasnt as large as it is today 80,000yrs ago.. Its was a fertile landscape with clusters of ppl livin in it. The actual gene that causes the lost of pigmentation in humans is only some 30,000yrs ago. No human fossils found are older than africas fossils. So the ignorance shows here in this video

  • @Ajanibakari Actually DNA shoews Non Africans are part Neandertahl and at least one other archaic group, which you'd know if you bothered to study anthropology.

  • What Africans are africans to you? what is the percentage of eurasian admix, 70%, 50% or maybe 2% or are you talking about present day nubians? Its funny if left to you the Ethiopians, Somalians, Sudanese heck even the Kenyans would be Caucasoid, but did Caucasoid phenotypes exist before the arrival of caucasians, if so what are you really talking about!?

  • @WesleySniperS1

    Norrth Africans are mainly there from backmigrations. NO, Kenyans aren't Caucasoid and I never said they were. East Africans and Nubians are a blend of both ancestries, in varying amounts. As are modern Egyptians and Nubians- it's called a clinal variation.

  • Respond to this video...  Slightly, about 55%.

    Lower Nubians and Lower Egyptians have exactly the same types of ancestry, and I mean exactly, but in sligjhtly different proprtions.

    Perhaps you should ask yourself why you feel incapable of admitting to this. Even a trained geneticist would have only a slightly better than chance rate of telling the two apart.

see all

All Comments (96)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Mathildaonline its funny how u just assume i dont study.lol. Neanderthal DNA is claimed to be found in a small % of "europeans" not "nonafricans". Asians and native americans do not hav Neanderthal DNA. And that is not new, Read "Iceman's Inheritance", the author claimed that theory of Neandethal and modern humans interbreeding somehow. bein that they flourished in europe around the time modern man(african) appeared in europe. All modern humans came from an African

  • so your theory is that africans left africa, turned white (which made them smarter), then went back to africa and created civilization..lmao

  • @nappyspice

    nappy-headed ho forgot to watch the vid

  • so africans found australia before europe.iy is just ridiculous out of africa is rubbish out of central asia is more feasable

  • LMFAO you are actually with a straight face gonna say ''The fact is lower Nubians are mainly of Eurasain ancestry too'' are you kidding! So was there a EURASIA in predynastic times? When exactly did those eurasians become nubians? I noticed you're subtle attempts to make lower egyptians appear Asiatics by claiming they were different and had ''crappy Asiatic ceramics, stone tools etc'' where was these Asiatic stone tools found in Africa, yes and egypt is in Africa?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more