Greg Clarke reviews Dan Brown's The Lost Symbol
Top Comments
All Comments (26)
-
@vincejap a lot of people complained about grammar in the book. I didn't find none.
-
I LOVED THIS BOOK!!!!!!¡!!!
-
This guy is just a prick.
He sounds like he read the book, but didn't really read it, just went in there with his mind already set in it's blind religous ways.
-
@mlxp the trolling is strong in this one
-
Religion is not unattractive because it is "complicate gobbledygook". Rather, it is unfounded and illogical, divisive, and often damaging to emotional wellbeing.
The chief problem with the Lost Symbol is that its driving premises are utterly ridiculous.
-
lol
-
dan brown is amazing!!!
i love all his book,..:))
-
the only thing that is lost is Dan Brown.
-
this is just a frustrated christian, or am I missing something. like said before: it's a novel, supported by some interesting facts, interesting for the mainstream and more intellegent public. it's going to sell big and that's because the book is a good one. the criticism of this man makes no sense.
it's subjective
-
well i gotta say this Dan Brown's style of writing is very predictable i mean if u have read his previous books they are all based in the same pattern . i mean when i started reading lost symbol after first few chapters i knew who is going to be the real villain ..so ithink dan brown really needs to change his writing style a bit its becoming repeptive
I've read every dan brown book and they're all great - and we know that they're all fiction
vincejap 2 years ago 5
This guy seems to be reviewing the book from a christian's point of view. His opinion is biased. How can he say the book is a dream but an impossible reality and then say that christianity is a reality? Both the book and Christianity provide the same ideas and concepts about a superior power but suggest different details and explanations. Who's to say one of them is an impossible reality if the other is equally as improbable?
oiaweh17 2 years ago 4