The Undertaker vs. Jason Helton + confrontation with Nailz
Top Comments
All Comments (284)
-
@KevServo Exactly. I mean, Dustin Runnels managed to get Goldust over. Some guys are just gifted performers.
-
@Buckeyecat2002 Thank you Sir, my apologies for being a doubter :)
-
@Voiceofvoiceless82 -Here is the link. "Onlineworldofwrestling." dawt comb. The Original Undertakers Tag Team were real life brothers Valentino and Anthony Puccio. They were signed to the WWF/E around 1989. Vincent McMahon purchased the name "Undertaker" from the Puccio Brothers and then gave the name to Mark Caloway, after he signed a contract.. The Puccio Brothers wrestled under the name "Double Trouble" for the WWF/E. They formerly used the Undertakers name on the East Coast.
-
@Buckeyecat2002 Do have any proof or links? Sounds like bullshit to me. There is no evidence of such a tag team online anyway
-
@Miah85 He wasn't. Brian Lee(Chainz) played the fake Taker. While Luke Gallows(Festus) played the fake Kane. While Kane himself played the fake Diesel...My one qualm is...Where's my Fake Sid Justice? :)
-
Nails was the fake undertaker... wow didnt even realized it!
-
In some sorta way doesn't Nailz kinda look like Fetus (aka Luke Gallows).
Undertaker vs.Nails would of been a awesome match..But too make it better put undertaker vs nails in a casket match.
Thumbs up if you agree......Undertaker vs Nailz, but a casket match.
Hasn't Nailz vs undertaker before????....If so,then where can I find the video of the match on YouTube???
Please tell me.
-
commentators are right nailz and untertaker should of had a matchup with each other
-
@KevServo i said that for ages the only person who could be themselves where rock and stone cold taker was given the role like hhh was given a gimmick to start and dusty rhodes but undertaker survived them all (gimmicks that is)
-
Not quite sure why you think that the "Undertaker" gimmick sucks on paper, especially in the 90s when there were grown men running around with tassles and face-paint calling themselves "Warrior", or huge men naming themselves after natural disasters, or adults with a cape and goofy crown referring themselves as "king". On paper, the Undertaker gimmick is priceless, and Calloway was the best to do it.
taker said no need to take the jacket off.
JoeBreeze22 7 months ago 7
The Undertaker gimmick sucks....on paper. It's a testament to the man's talent as a performer that it didn't bomb. I'm convinced that if the gimmick were given to anybody else it would have been wrestlecrap, but still with all the goofy and stupid angles he's been involved in over the years, The Undertaker has become a legend and an icon. Truly a phenom.
KevServo 8 months ago 6