Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The Heresy of Sola Scriptura & more...

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
10,358
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 17, 2007

Dealing briefly with the self-refuting nature of Sola Scriptura, the lack of a normative standard and means by which Protestants may deem doctrines heresy, and the introduction to the segment handling the Sacrament of Penance.

  • likes, 15 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,111)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Great video.

  • @astralharmony I have studied history which is why I know there is one true church. Why dont you answer your own question. I already did answer it since the church is authoritative as handed over by Christ and by Her binding authority declared the inspired canon. So what in your mind makes the books authoritative and be sure that you are NOT using circular logic.

  • @catchzz You're the one who needs to study history. My question was partly rhetorical. The canon was may have been officially recognized by some council, but these councils did not determine it. Here is another question: Who/what makes these books authoritative? Surely you don't believe that a council does.

  • @HiDefJesus Catholic church councils determined the canon. Study history.

  • Roman Catholicism denies the Gospel by saying that faith is necessary but not sufficient. Faith is sufficient for salvation which leads to good works (Eph. 2:8-10).

  • Exellent Catholic aplogetics. My God bless you through your efforts to share the one true faith!

  • @182RG Who determined the canon?

  • HidefJesus

    As it turns out, it was authoritative when he wrote it.

    But that's irrelevant - The problem was that many books were considered inspired by some, but not others. Many congregations were using several writings that were later deemed non-canonic, and rejecting inspired works - possibly even the gospel of John that you mention - and preaching false and incomplete gospel. THAT was the importance of the determination of canon

  • @182RG You seem to have missed the implication of my question. Was the Gospel of John authoritative the moment John wrote it or only after it was deemed authoritative by men?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more