"Crazy" Mormon Theology
Uploader Comments (DefendingMormonism)
All Comments (156)
-
understand that i am unbiased against momanism. all seem equally improbably and all religions to me are equal in their absurdity. the only difference is when other faiths question mormanism they use the logic that they believe their faith to be exempt from and that is a horrible double standard. p.s. i dont know the proper term for abserving the morman faith. i guessed mormanism
-
I determined at least two things, at least, from this discussion and some of your other postings on this matter. Hence, no sole determinant. But thanks for helping out.
-
In one posting, you said "that I would not use what you say as the sole determinate of the value of the religion."
Now you are saying "I could only make my conclusions based on your information about the church...."
Either my comments are not the "sole determinate" for your conclusions, or they are the "only" ones you will use. Which is the truth?
-
I could only make my conclusions based on your information about the church, and I appreciate that. Thanks for shedding a true light on LDS. I'll be sure to share all that you offered.
-
You are certainly free to make any conclusions about the LDS Church that you wish.
-
We now agree that blacks were treated differently. The church did not allow them to become priests, and that was the policy of the church until recently. I'm not at all interested in ancient Israel, so your question is irrelevant, but the relevant question: Is being denied access to the priesthood "treated poorly?" I say, "Yes, without question." You say, "I don't think so." That's useful for me to conclude my analysis of what you believe. Thanks for the replies.
-
Did the LDS Church "treat blacks differently?" The answer is yes. After 1850, Church policy did not allow blacks to be ordained to the Priesthood. Is that "treating blacks poorly?" I don't think so. In ancient Israel only Levites received the priesthood. All other Israelites were banned from holding the priesthood. Were non-Levites treated poorly?
-
Just in case you decide to answer the question still outstanding, please note that I would not use what you say as the sole determinant of the value of the religion. I would certainly include many other sources of information, including BoM. Your responses (unfortunately continuing to avoid the question) just gives some insight into the thinking of those that are members. And that's certainly useful for making a judgement.
-
Whether I have read the BoM or not is not the issue. I asked you - you said both that Mormons did not treat blacks differently, and that they did, but only after other religions did. I am interested in what YOU have to say. BoM comes after that. Also, you still didn't answer the question last posted -> Is the different treatment that blacks experienced in the LDS church a function of the directives in your studies, or were the perpetrators "rogues?"
I'm so sick of people calling mormons ignorant and uneducated. You obviously have a very biased perspective of religion. It's also really upsetting to see the generalization used when referring to those of the lds faith. I am a Mormon, and I am very proud to be so. I do not believe things because I am told to do so, I believe them because I myself choose to just as atheists, Jews, and Muslims do. I am very educated in both scriptural history and scientific knowledge. I am well-read, I speak for
JLexine13 4 months ago 4
@JLexine13 People are often afraid of and hate what they don't understand. They also rarely take the time to try and understand what they don't understand.
DefendingMormonism 3 months ago 4