Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Squash Great Dummy Spits3 - El Hindi vs Palmer

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
23,280
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Mar 25, 2009

Dave Palmer against Wael El Hindi, funny collision & situation

Category:

Comedy

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • what a blunder on the officiating! An obvious stroke to El Hindi who played a great shot and Palmer who left himself out to dry with a poorly placed shot back to himself. Terrible call!

  • Pallmer was mistaken, it may have felt like that, but it was obviously a stroke.

see all

All Comments (33)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Still acting like a spoilt brat.

  • Dobio je nogom u dupe heh

  • Fair play is not el hindi's and Palmer's strong side and that is what happens when 2 of the same meet. Stroke 2 hindi is the right call but a let is not a disaster either. Also a stroke 2 palmer because of el hindis bla-blaing.

  • hindi let himself go down on purpose. looks like soccer to me.

  • fail

    

  • an absolute stroke...no doubts about that...but then we do have referring errors happening al the time...players just need to swallow that and keep doing what they do best....BURN RUBBER!!!!

  • @doubledotter agree. stroke

  • such a bad call. maybe squash needs to consider video replays. some refs who officiate these tournaments are simply not the same class as the players they're refereeing.

  • @faisalkfpm That's really the unfortunate truth of it, isn't it? There's so much room for argument. We need to take the "no arguing" approach that the NBA has put in place and implement it in squash. El Hindi should have definitely ended up down 5-3 after a conduct stroke. Personally, I think it was a let because El Hindi could have swung, and because it was a very awkward position (though I would have accepted 'stroke' as well), but the players really need to suck it up and keep playing.

  • The referee correctly issued a conduct warning for time wasting. However, a conduct stroke should have been awarded when El Hindi continued to delay play. The referee is required to control the match and El Hindi is gaining unfair advantage by delaying play. Merely stating that no further discussions will be entered into is not sufficient; if, after a warning is given, a player defiantly continues to delay play, a stroke should be awarded - otherwise El Hindi would attempt to debate later calls.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more