Evolution: Fossils, Genes, and Mousetraps (8-9)
Top Comments
All Comments (48)
-
@LoricaLady I've already answered your questions. You are now projecting your inability to debate onto me, given that you weren't even dimly aware of something as basic as tectonic uplift. But you're right, making cheap thinly veiled insinuations and running is probably your best option now
-
@ABriefHistoryOfTime Please see my post below, TO ANYONE. You are now free to leave me strings & strings of posts, like your friend before you, which never answer the Qs I made, and not feel the slightest bit challenged by another point of view. Unless someone actually gets on this string and wants to try to use science & logic & not just flail out with personal insults & vague dataless statements about "science."
-
@LoricaLady Actually all they did here was point out your ignorance of geologic specifically and the scientific method in general.
The scientific method does not incorporate intangible magic as it's useless.
-
TO ANYONE: If you see no reply to some posters below they know they are on ignore for things like name calling, personal insults and general evasion of Qs posed, i.e. a refusal to truly debate. If anyone wants to ask any of the same Qs they ask I will be happy to respond. However I will only debate where true scientific debate is possible, with those who are civil & objective.
-
@LoricaLady That's because science is specifically methodological naturalism whereas the supernatural is useless assertion producing nothing but intangible non-answers.
-
@LoricaLady 'including on many mountain tops'
You might want to learn anything at all about geology. It's known as 'uplift'
-
@LoricaLady That's all well and good given that biochemistry and selection are not random processes.
If you actually watch the video you'll notice he points out that directed panspermia is not an answer, that it just puts the origin of life question elsewhere.
-
@LoricaLady Actually biogenesis only regards modern life and the debunking of it spontaneously arising from non-living medium, Pasteur's work had nothing to do with the biochemical origin of life.
-
@LoricaLady 'evidence is in the opposite direction'
Such s?
-
To be continued on 9/9.
This guy has probably voiced the most effective and concise argument for evolution and against Intelligent Design that i've heard... and it would even be persuasive to religious people... and it only has 792 views. What a shame.
kelsarhu 3 years ago 14
i dunno most religious do this *fingers in ears* la la la la JESUS la la la
AshNekoBoy 3 years ago 4