M3 grease gun calibro 9 para
Top Comments
All Comments (23)
-
My dad used 1 of these in the army & liked it. M3 was 1 of Delta Force's 1st weapons Col Beckwith got a good deal on them from the CIA. Filipino marines/navy still use the M3 supposedly the filipinos can overhaul & modify 40 M3 SMGs for what it would cost them to put a single Heckler & Koch UMP into service. Some people prefer a lower rate of fire. My thoughts are if a weapon was crap it would not be around so long e.g. M3, Browning M2, AK47, Colt 1911.
-
@timrocket007 Not true mate. The grease gun cost about $50 and the tommy gun cost about $400 in its late war version. The British army rejected the grease gun on the grounds that the sten cost less to make. But did keep importing the tommy gun in small numbers even after the sten became available in large numbers. The British army was very unimpressed by the grease gun performance or build quality. A bit hypercritical if you look at the sten Mk2. :-)
-
my dad had one of these and a m60vn in the army and the m3 he said was extemely inaccurate but cheap and more reliable in jamming, taking apart, and figuring out ways
-
i do not know much about these firearms, but do they come with an alternative semiautomatic mode too?
-
grease gun cost like 1/100 of the price to make a tommy gun
and it was good so more could be equipped
-
@ArmyGold not a grease gun, a tommy is much faster
-
@ArmyGold rate of fire isnt determined by the round its determined by the manufacturer and the springs and parts they use. any round can have a high rate of fire if the bolt and spring allow. lets not get all nub now....
-
You obviously haven't heard of the KRISS .45 ACP.
-
cause greasers in the 40's used to use that gun
-
@ramco69 you are on drugs! Almost any 9mms ROF is much faster than a .45.
cause it looks like a grease gun ..:P
dexter12322222222222 2 years ago 14
M3 vs MP40
Fight!
SecretTrollAccount1 2 years ago 13