ProtectOurElections.org Calls On Justice Thomas To Step Down

www.ProtectOurElections.org has asked the Justice Department to bring criminal charges against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas for making false statements on his AO 10 Financial Disclosure forms every year since 2003 by falsely swearing under criminal penalty that his wife Virginia had no non-investment income. http://www.velvetrevolution.us/images/Clarence_Thomas_DOJ_Letter.pdf Within six hours of our request, Justice Thomas announced that he had amended not seven but twenty years of financial disclosure forms to include his wife's income. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Supreme_Court/justice-clarence-thomas-amends-f... Justice Thomas said that he misunderstood the filing instructions which asked him to check whether his wife had any non-investment income, to which he checked "none."

Virginia Thomas worked at the Heritage Foundation from 2003 through 2007 and earned at least $120,000 each year according to the foundation's IRS Form 990s. She then went to work for Liberty Central in a paid position according to its CEO Sarah Field. Last Friday, Common Cause wrote to the Administrative Office of the Courts about this matter, which was reported by the Los Angeles Times on Saturday. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-thomas-disclosure-201101... Justice Thomas is facing up to one year in prison and a criminal fine for each false statement charge, and a civil fine of up to $50,000 under 5 U.S.C appendix § 104. Justice Thomas' conduct is similar to that of an FBI employee who oversaw background investigations for the agency in San Francisco. Rachelle Thomas-Zuill said on a financial disclosure form that she owned three properties with an outstanding mortgage debt of $866,000, when in fact she owned six properties and had a debt of more than $2.2 million. Thomas-Zuill, who joined the FBI 13 years ago, pleaded guilty last week to making false statements to a government agency, a felony. She will be sentenced April 7th by U.S. District Judge Jeremy Fogel in San Jose.

The Department of Justice civilly prosecuted two other recent false statement cases. In United States v. Dr. William L. Smith, a NASA scientist was charged with violating 18 U.S.C section 208(a,)and he settled the case for a substantial fine. In United States v. John R. Van Rosendale, a DOE employee failed under 5 U.S.C. app. § 104 to file a termination financial disclosure report when he left his Government position and he was also fined. "Yesterday, we asked the Department of Justice to bring criminal charges against Justice Thomas for his knowing and willful false statements under oath," said attorney and campaign spokesman Kevin Zeese. "In response, Justice Thomas admitted that he made false statements on 20 years of disclosure forms, but that it was just a simple misunderstanding. How many criminal defendants have said the same thing but were not offered the same opportunity to correct or amend their statements before being prosecuted? How many cases has Justice Thomas sat in judgment of where people were charged with similar conduct? How many lawyers would have asked for Justice Thomas' recusal had the disclosure forms been accurate? Supreme Court Justices are supposed to know the law. Yet, Justice Thomas wants to be treated differently than others who committed similar conduct. His 'misunderstanding' excuse should be argued before a federal jury rather than to a committee that has no authority to grant him immunity from prosecution. No, Justice Thomas cannot be allowed to merely amend his forms without full accountability. We call for him to step down as Supreme Court Justice and for a complete audit of all cases in which he sat to determine if his lack of disclosure created a conflict of interest or undermined the fairness of the judgment. We also call for a criminal investigation by career prosecutors at the Department of Justice and an ethics investigation. Anything less would make a mockery of financial disclosure law, undermine respect for the law, and create the appearance that those in powerful positions can violate the law with impunity."

www.ProtectOurElections.org

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• supreme
• court
• justice
• clarence
• virginia
• ginny
• thomas
• 1978
• ethics
• government
• act
• disclosure
• income
• heritage
• foundation

[cldump]

the first question i have is is this group funded by the left?

[VRAdmin]

@cldump - We are funded by concerned American citizens that worry about our Democracy subverted by Theofascists and Corporate America. This is all free speech and free assembly, and who "funds us" is not "the left" or "the right"...but AMERICA.

[cardcreekdesign]

@cldump you should go on. because your point makes it clear that such conflicts of interest and tax issues are definitive in regards to an individuals fitness for public service. And clearly, the tax problems of Clarence Thomas, which are well documented, coupled with his obvious (and numerous) conflicts of interest between he and his wife's activism, do call into question his fitness for public service.

[cardcreekdesign]

@cldump What is "The Left"?

[cldump]

@electrichamster1 Kathleen Sebelius, had tax issues

Tom Daschle, withdrew from consideration over tax issues, as did chief performance officer nominee Nancy Killefer.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, US Trade Representative Ron Kirk and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, meanwhile, were confirmed despite issues related to their taxes.

we could go on LOL

[cldump]

@VRAdmin i am going to go out on a limb and call shenanigans on that. are you stating that no George Soros group is connected with you or has given you any funds?

I have news for you I am and American and i don't want to fund ya.

No republican gave you a dime.

[georip]

It appears that you have stirred up a hornets nest of the disinfo', astroturf cabal, the trolls that only seek to obfuscate an issue the public should rightly be concerned about, and have multiple email addresses so that it appears from comments they are many but are most likely only one paid agent of Cass Sunstein, Obama's infiltrator in chief, blathering endlessly to divert attention.

alternet.org/story/150049/

Keep up the great work!

Let others bring down Geithner.

[YHWHisSovereign]

How about getting the fascist lefties off the court? How about prosecuting Obama for his lies? I would say impeach him, but he's not even illegible to be president.

[knowhelpnow]

Prosecute criminally if found guilty then jail and impeach.

[knowhelpnow]

@jonahfox

He shouldn't be associated with any political party where his vote would change our laws. They are their to determine if a law is constitutionally correct not to make new laws. You need to up on the three branches of our government.

[jonahfox]

@cldump Do you really have to ask? The only reason they are attacking him is because he is associated with the tea party.